Nathanial.Dread said:
slewb said:
You can't really blame the kids who OD'd for not doing their research... they were told by someone they trusted that what they were taking was a mushroom extract cooked into chocolate. That doesn't sound that far-fetched to me. You can blame the asshole who told them it was a mushroom extract but later told the police that he had no idea what it actually was.
I disagree with you on this. If you hop in a car, turn it on, and speed off towards the highway having never taking a single drivers ed class, you're an idiot and there is a huge chance you're going to get into big trouble one way or another.
Taking drugs is the same way. The price of freedom is personal responsibility.
Blessings
~ND
That's unnecessarily harsh and not a fair analogy imo.. The kids who consumed it could not have known it was not a mushrooms extract if they have no testing service, plus there is no social services or official courses to inform people on drugs just like driver's education classes exist. Also, someone driving without any knowledge will put others at risk, not only themselves, and these kids were not putting others at risk when consuming themselves.
The person who stole the dealer and sold to those kids, on the other hand, yeah I think you can safely call him an idiot.
And as metanoia said, if the mushrooms were really mushrooms, nothing would have happened, so it's prohibition to blame.