Thoughts on purity

[Sakkadelic]

the infinite number of nines does not mean there is infinitly more DMT, the difference between 99.99% and 100% of 30mg DMT is just 0.003mg so no matter how much farther you purify it the increase of DMT will be less than 0.003mg , the brain simply does not respond to this tiny amount. there shouldn't be any difference between them..
but if you don't like the taste and smell then it can alter the experience for you, but that is in no way caused by that tiny amount of DMT.

 

[LevitatingGod]

the infinite number of nines does not mean there is infinitly more DMT, the difference between 99.99% and 100% of 30mg DMT is just 0.003mg so no matter how much farther you purify it the increase of DMT will be less than 0.003mg , the brain simply does not respond to this tiny amount. there shouldn't be any difference between them..
but if you don't like the taste and smell then it can alter the experience for you, but that is in no way caused by that tiny amount of DMT.

Interesting stuff.
I see your point buddy
Much Love

 

[melotikaci]

the infinite number of nines does not mean there is infinitly more DMT, the difference between 99.99% and 100% of 30mg DMT is just 0.003mg so no matter how much farther you purify it the increase of DMT will be less than 0.003mg , the brain simply does not respond to this tiny amount. there shouldn't be any difference between them..
but if you don't like the taste and smell then it can alter the experience for you, but that is in no way caused by that tiny amount of DMT.

Interesting stuff.
I see your point buddy
Much Love

No offense but it isn't interesting stuff, it's just the simplest calculations which you should have done before claiming that 99.9% pure dmt is much better than 99%

 

[LevitatingGod]

the infinite number of nines does not mean there is infinitly more DMT, the difference between 99.99% and 100% of 30mg DMT is just 0.003mg so no matter how much farther you purify it the increase of DMT will be less than 0.003mg , the brain simply does not respond to this tiny amount. there shouldn't be any difference between them..
but if you don't like the taste and smell then it can alter the experience for you, but that is in no way caused by that tiny amount of DMT.

Interesting stuff.
I see your point buddy
Much Love

No offense but it isn't interesting stuff, it's just the simplest calculations which you should have done before claiming that 99.9% pure dmt is much better than 99%

You telling me it isn't interesting stuff doesn't make me disinterested. My interest isn't for you to determine, 1, and 2, these classifications on what is "true" are just perceptions being manifested. The double slit experiment will show you that all matter can be in an infinite state of probability (anything can happen) or we collapse its potential by "making an oberservation" which is thereby creating the matter to fulfill what was observed/calculated/concluded.
So when you tell me that it's a simple calculation that differentiates 99.99 & 100% pure, that makes me think about how the only way we determine its purity is by technology that can detect all known elements, not the things we have yet to learn exist. So to be honest, I still feel if technology we make tells us it's 100% pure, there is still something not calculated within the matter that would say otherwise on its percentage of purity.
My point being, truth is relative to what you seek to know and alchemical legends state all matter in its purest forms is comprised of the same substance and until it falls out of the most pure state, it remains transmuted into this substance. I'm not saying this is truth but who is to say here's what is the absolute? The ones that have created that to be their truth? Okay, fine, fair enough. So on the note that anything is possible and I manifest my own truth and reality, it's interesting stuff seeing all points of view. As you can see, I still feel unchanged by all of what you and everyone else believes because this is always a matter of perspective, never an absolute. The only absolute is that all and no absolutes are absolute. What I perceive, I conceive. "When I changed the way I looked at things, the things I looked at changed."
We are all manifesting what we believe and to that, I cheers you in accordance to your manifested choice.

 

[SnozzleBerry]

Cut the crap, this is nonsense:

truth is relative to what you seek to know and alchemical legends state all matter in its purest forms is comprised of the same substance and until it falls out of the most pure state, it remains transmuted into this substance.

Are you going to post that crystal tek or not? I'm rather skeptical at this point...

 

[dreamer042]

Cut the crap, this is nonsense:

truth is relative to what you seek to know and alchemical legends state all matter in its purest forms is comprised of the same substance and until it falls out of the most pure state, it remains transmuted into this substance.

Are you going to post that crystal tek or not? I'm rather skeptical at this point...

^^^ This

Yet another person coming through with big promises and no delivery. :?

 

[LevitatingGod]

Cut the crap, this is nonsense:

truth is relative to what you seek to know and alchemical legends state all matter in its purest forms is comprised of the same substance and until it falls out of the most pure state, it remains transmuted into this substance.

Are you going to post that crystal tek or not? I'm rather skeptical at this point...

It's not non sense. There were pyramids build that sat over "pools of mercury" and the idea Mercury can be turned to gold dates further back than our bodies are old. So I'm saying the idea it's possible existed before you were here telling me it's nonsense.
Who is to say what is nonsense or truth anyway? We as a species are still vibrating at a frequency that, if continues to raise(Schumann resonance), we could all literally awaken to a point where we realize what being consciously awake literally means. All in all, there are experiments showing that 2 people can see entirely different images casted from 1 object. It's basically showing it being all about the angle you perceive from. I am one to lookin into things like epigenetics and what I find brilliant is that all our thoughts correspond in a way that makes it seemingly as if we are just thoughts expressing and exemplifying in accordance to ones thinking. The epitome of expression is perception.
I respect you and everyone I come across, but I would appreciate it if you would please stop classifiying what I know inside to resonate truth as 'nonsense'. Our heart serves as a kind of intermediary that translates beliefs and feelings into corresponding electrical and magnetic vibration and waves.
Also, I have just finished typing up the technique and I just need to have my buddy turn it to a PDF or word document for everyone to download bc it has a pictorial too.

 

[LevitatingGod]

Cut the crap, this is nonsense:

truth is relative to what you seek to know and alchemical legends state all matter in its purest forms is comprised of the same substance and until it falls out of the most pure state, it remains transmuted into this substance.

Are you going to post that crystal tek or not? I'm rather skeptical at this point...

^^^ This

Yet another person coming through with big promises and no delivery. :?

Man the first post was a preview for my intro essay, I didn't know that would be okay to post a tek as an into essay or I would've had it typed up and ready.. I'm sorry for the delay, I have just finished typing it and aligning the pictorial with the steps properly and my buddy is going to turn it to a file for everyone to easily download when I post it today. Once again, I hope you see shortly I am here just trying to actually get the thing on here. It's been years in development in my side and a burning passion, I am not here making everyone wait for no reason but rather because I'm getting it ready as a file after having to finish typing it.

 

[endlessness]

Guys, I understand the frustrations but lets try to be welcoming and respectful with the new member, if there is something we dont agree with we can point it out and hope the constructive criticism is received. In the end we all want the same thing, to better ourselves and to learn and share what we learn.

LevitatingGod, understand that in the past a lot of people came to talk about their new teks or whatever and never posted or posted suboptimal material, so when someone mentions it a few times and doesnt immediately post what they advertise, people get suspicious. Dont take it personally, they mean no harm. So before talking more about it just work on your file and attach to your thread

Be well

 

[SnozzleBerry]

I apologize if my posts were overly aggressive. In the future, please refrain from replying to factual assertions (e.g. the difference between 99.99% and 100% of 30mg DMT is just 0.003mg) with flights of fancy (e.g. truth is relative to what you seek to know and alchemical legends state all matter in its purest forms is comprised of the same substance and until it falls out of the most pure state, it remains transmuted into this substance.).

I look forward to seeing your pictorial

 

[downwardsfromzero]

I still know that the higher the purity ingested, the more likely you are to envelop into a stronger experience. If this were not true, one could smoke say 85% pure dmt and achieve the same effect as 90% but that isn't the case because the higher the content of purity, the more heightened experience,

Doesn't it also depend on what the remaining 'impurities' are? If the remaining 15% were ice cream or arsenic or underpants we'd see something of a difference compared to, say, betacarbolines or NMT.

 

[DansMaTete]

Personally, i like my (8% underpants + 7% goose down), it adds something very special to my dmt adventure.

 

[LevitatingGod]

Guys, I understand the frustrations but lets try to be welcoming and respectful with the new member, if there is something we dont agree with we can point it out and hope the constructive criticism is received. In the end we all want the same thing, to better ourselves and to learn and share what we learn.

LevitatingGod, understand that in the past a lot of people came to talk about their new teks or whatever and never posted or posted suboptimal material, so when someone mentions it a few times and doesnt immediately post what they advertise, people get suspicious. Dont take it personally, they mean no harm. So before talking more about it just work on your file and attach to your thread

Be well

I am tryi to post me tek now but how do I upload a pdf file? It only is giving me options to upload pictures

 

[Jees]

... I am tryi to post me tek now but how do I upload a pdf file? It only is giving me options to upload pictures

No difference between pics and pdf's, and it works.

 

[pitubo]

It's not non sense. There were pyramids build that sat over "pools of mercury" and the idea Mercury can be turned to gold dates further back than our bodies are old. So I'm saying the idea it's possible existed before you were here telling me it's nonsense.

Can you provide me with any reasonably solid references for your statements above about pyramids and pools of mercury? I am genuinely curious.

As for the ideas about transmutation of mercury into gold: humanity has entertained fairy tales for ages, too. One of the main distinctions that separates experimental science from fairy tales is independently reproducible evidence. AFAIK there is none of that good stuff for these "alchemical" claims about transmutation.

Personally, I don't mind talk about alchemical transmutation, as long as it is positioned clearly in a metaphorical context. I actually like such allegories, fairy tales with a serious undertone, as an inspirational musing and a wellspring for more factually sound and healthy inquisitiveness.

Misinterpreting figurative thinking with a literal mind is the main source of the bane of religious nonsense and all the horrors of its excesses. Attempting to give it a scientific veneer by calling it "alchemy" doesn't make it respectable in my perspective.

Who is to say what is nonsense or truth anyway?

Truth is just another allegory, to be understood with appropriate nuances and subtleties. It is a work in progress, forever. Hence the scientific method.

Stating that truth is difficult to ascertain can never be used as a justification to run off into fact free twilight zones of speculative ramblings, even if these might be highly amusing or entertaining (subject to perspective, of course).

I respect you and everyone I come across, but I would appreciate it if you would please stop classifiying what I know inside to resonate truth as 'nonsense'.

The problems may be arising due to your publicly posting here, what resonates inside you as truth, in such a manner that it in other people's perspective implies that you are also proclaiming these to be common truth.

Unless you add disclaimers in bold that your musings are not meant to be making any claims in public "truthspace", people are IMHO rightly assuming that you are making public claims and are rightfully responding critically.

Anyway, welcome to the nexus!

 

[endlessness]

Good post pitubo.

And to add to what you said:

Attitude Page - DMT-Nexus Wiki

wiki.dmt-nexus.me

 

[LevitatingGod]

It's not non sense. There were pyramids build that sat over "pools of mercury" and the idea Mercury can be turned to gold dates further back than our bodies are old. So I'm saying the idea it's possible existed before you were here telling me it's nonsense.

Can you provide me with any reasonably solid references for your statements above about pyramids and pools of mercury? I am genuinely curious.

As for the ideas about transmutation of mercury into gold: humanity has entertained fairy tales for ages, too. One of the main distinctions that separates experimental science from fairy tales is independently reproducible evidence. AFAIK there is none of that good stuff for these "alchemical" claims about transmutation.

Personally, I don't mind talk about alchemical transmutation, as long as it is positioned clearly in a metaphorical context. I actually like such allegories, fairy tales with a serious undertone, as an inspirational musing and a wellspring for more factually sound and healthy inquisitiveness.

Misinterpreting figurative thinking with a literal mind is the main source of the bane of religious nonsense and all the horrors of its excesses. Attempting to give it a scientific veneer by calling it "alchemy" doesn't make it respectable in my perspective.

Who is to say what is nonsense or truth anyway?

Truth is just another allegory, to be understood with appropriate nuances and subtleties. It is a work in progress, forever. Hence the scientific method.

Stating that truth is difficult to ascertain can never be used as a justification to run off into fact free twilight zones of speculative ramblings, even if these might be highly amusing or entertaining (subject to perspective, of course).

I respect you and everyone I come across, but I would appreciate it if you would please stop classifiying what I know inside to resonate truth as 'nonsense'.

The problems may be arising due to your publicly posting here, what resonates inside you as truth, in such a manner that it in other people's perspective implies that you are also proclaiming these to be common truth.

Unless you add disclaimers in bold that your musings are not meant to be making any claims in public "truthspace", people are IMHO rightly assuming that you are making public claims and are rightfully responding critically.

Anyway, welcome to the nexus!

Gotcha Gotcha gotcha, I see.
I am aware of what you're saying and follow exactly now.
Sorry I'm one to believe anything is possible, but this is because I look around and see impossible happening in all ways, all the time. From me actually being here experiencing what we call "life", to the sun shining what we call "light." I believe this is all to show us all things are possible, but that's just my belief and take on it. Some people look around and think being in the midst of life is more possible than the idea of say, acoustic levitation.
Without life, we wouldn't even know what acoustic levitation is/could be. So my point is that no matter what anyone tries to convince me of, I will always know at heart all things are possible.

 

[pitubo]

No references for those pyramids on pools of mercury? Oh well..

In our dreams we can immerse ourselves into what is possible.
In our lives we are immersed into what is probable.

Keep an open mind, bu don't let your brain fall out.

 

[LevitatingGod]

No references for those pyramids on pools of mercury? Oh well..

In our dreams we can immerse ourselves into what is possible.
In our lives we are immersed into what is probable.

Keep an open mind, bu don't let your brain fall out.

Oh my gosh I'm gonna have to reuse those lmao!

"An archaeologist has discovered liquid mercury at the end of a tunnel beneath a Mexican pyramid, a finding that could suggest the existence of a king’s tomb or a ritual chamber far below one of the most ancient cities of the Americas.

Mexican researcher Sergio Gómez announced on Friday that he had discovered “large quantities” of liquid mercury in a chamber below the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent, the third largest pyramid of Teotihuacan, the ruined city in central Mexico."
This is theguardian.com

I was trying to find the literal interview I watched but cannot :/ They clearly state they don't know why it's there.

We lost ancient knowledge of frequency and inevitably will return to the brilliance we once had. There is some story of Japanese researchers cleaning a lake that had oil in it with 528Hz frequency. I'm trying to locate the exact article, though.
Oh another fun topic is sound levitation too. The idea vibrations could lift ourself into the air is something I'd fantasized for since childhood. Look up "acoustic levitation" sometime if you want, interesting stuff and supposedly Tibetian Monks lifted stones using chants and trumpets this way.

 

[downwardsfromzero]

Curious, the Chinese also had pools of liquid mercury in their pyramids, IIRC. I'd have to dig deep for a reference for that, though :?

supposedly Tibet[an] Monks lifted stones using chants and trumpets this way

Start us a thread somewhere with the sound stuff in, I'm interested!
I had a look already: How Acoustic Levitation Works