"But in a society where only, say, 3% of people had to work some of the time to keep things running"
Okay, but why would 3% of people want to do that work while the other 97% just has leisure time? Wouldnt it make more sense for that work to just be spread thin amongst everyone? That way each person just contributes a very small ammount of work and things are equal while the same ammount of work is completed.
The ammount of work that people had to do if it was just 3% of people doing it would be rediculous. It would be as if a very tiny percent of the population were literally slaving away while the majority just sort of live it up. That sounds far from egalitarian to me.
Okay, but why would 3% of people want to do that work while the other 97% just has leisure time? Wouldnt it make more sense for that work to just be spread thin amongst everyone? That way each person just contributes a very small ammount of work and things are equal while the same ammount of work is completed.
The ammount of work that people had to do if it was just 3% of people doing it would be rediculous. It would be as if a very tiny percent of the population were literally slaving away while the majority just sort of live it up. That sounds far from egalitarian to me.

They have become very good friends.