An informational, online drug site that's at my level.

[Alexicus]

Are you also here to read and LEARN or just to post and TEACH ?

I ask this honestly, because you seem very eager to share your insights, you say you want to post and 'contribute', but you make no mention of actually wanting to take your time to read from the wealth of information that is around here. We ALL have something to learn here in this community, no matter how many months or years one has been here already.

I'm here for both. I have read all the posts here. I read the one's critiquing my writing style. What I meant when I said "I skipped them" was that I'm not going to respond to those posts because they are mainly true, and I have nothing of important significance to add to them.

I have learned from you guys, but you don't see it, so let me prove it by taking the time to respond to some posts. First I need to clarify a few things though.

 

[Alexicus]

I realize I was coming off as preachy as first, but can we please move on from that? In my mind this hypothesis solves almost all the major mysteries of life. However, you may or may not agree with it. I want your opinion on my hypothesis, and that's the real reason why I posted this in the first place.

I'm not trying to indoctrinate you into some sort of suicide cult. I'm not trying to convert you to my life style. I'm not trying to change you, or what makes you happy at all. What I am trying to do is show you my theory. And that's ALL. I don't care if you accept it or dismiss it, I want your opinion.

That is the real truth behind why I'm posting. I'm merely one consciousness, by myself I cannot solve this entirely. With the help of the Internet and like minded individuals I can though. There clearly was a misinterpretation if I came off as elitist, I did not mean to.

You guys are on my level of consciousness is all I was trying to say. Skim/read this article levels of consciousness. Keep in mind though that you can be at any level of consciousness, but you primarily live in one state of consciousness. I believe I have reached the state of peace 4 times. These 4 moments of peace were caused by 2 dmt trips, and 2 shroom trips. From these 4 moments of peace, I have been able to ascertain a hypothesis of the universe that may be able to show the path to enlightenment.

Currently my sober, normal consciousness resides in a state of love. Many people in the world are not on this level, but I believe many of the forum users on this board are on the state of love, if not even further. I see it in the way this community is set up, the guidelines, rules, and even the opinion’s of forum users on a variety of topics.

Before I did drugs, I was depressed, and on the verge of suicide. I was at the lowest state of consciousness. I was suicidal because I had a horrible childhood. I had 3 choices that I saw I could make when I was growing up.

1.)Suck it up, continue being sober, try to find happiness, and don't kill myself.
2.)Talk to therapists and get prescribed to SSRIs that may not even work.
3.)Check off my bucket list before committing suicide. Trying drugs and psychedelics was one of those.

Eventually the external forces in my life that caused my depression stacked upon each other so much so that I saw suicide as the only way out. In my suicidal state of mind, I sought to do illicit drugs instead of the conventional see a therapist/get prescribed way to depression, because I could clearly no longer handle sobriety.

I was 18 when I tried weed for the first time. I had a life changing experience from that first time that caused me to radically alter my views of life.

After that first time smoking weed, I was hooked to altering the state of my consciousness. I was fascinated by how radically you can alter your state of consciousness with drugs, primarily psychedelics. I then focused on introspection and bettering who I was as an individual.

I’ve done drugs for 2 years, and the accumulation of a lot of introspection with the aid of weed and various other drugs has transformed who I define myself to be. The 18 year old me hated himself, and the world. I was an apathetic, nihilistic, atheist waiting for death. I was a tormented, messed up soul that was the result of a bad hand of cards life gave me regarding my external environment as a child.

I am now 20, and for the first time in my life, I not only love myself, I love other people. And not just other people, but everyone.

Even those that have wronged me. There are no good or bad experiences, for experiences help serve as a stepping stone for self improvement. Experiences grant you knowledge, and from knowledge you can learn. A bad experience, or a moment of adversity, is merely an experience you have yet to internalize, accept, and learn from. I still have trouble loving, and even accepting people who have caused bad experiences upon me, though. All experiences that have caused grievances with my ego have been resolved save 2 major ones I don’t really wish to talk about now. However, I have been able to learn from those 2 major moments of adversity as well, so I no longer internalize them as bad experiences.

 

[Alexicus]

Now think about it this way: you yourself have had to figure this out for your self. Possibly the fact that it came out of your own consciousness is what makes this theory so valuable to you, and anyone who was to simply listen to it, would not even gain half of the deeper insights (those that can't be expressed by words) as you have.

In gnosticism the experience of God first hand was one of the most important experiences a practitioner could have. Each individual has to reach this experience for himself though. No one can give it to them. Personally I think the system doctrine-student is flawed. If you have found your personal path and know which way to go, I salute you, and wish you the best of luck on it. But you cannot make other people walk YOUR path nor believe in your truths without them losing their own way. Certainly there are things that we all have in common and that's why it's always interesting to read other people's insights, but these things cannot be taught or transmitted like instructions to an ik3a piece of furniture. The process of finding these insights IMO is by far more important than the insights themselves, once they are put into words.

So to summarize, the criticism here is that you should not try to teach or indoctrinat or bring people to YOUR level. First of all perhaps we are not all meant to be on the same level, and more likely there is no ONE level of ultimate goodness, but things are a bit more complex and dynamic. Second of all your level might not really be any better than the ones the others are on already, you might just not see it this way. It could be that your perception is flawed and you just don't see the bigger picture, even though you think you do. This is something you should always consider. But looking at your posts it seems that you are very sure of yourself and your vision of the world, and this in general will only hinder you from learning more about the world in all it's strangeness and beauty.

Thank you for your kind words of wisdom, I took these words into consideration even before I posted this idea. That's why I chose to post this idea in dmt-nexus, and not some forum dedicated to lolcats.

The way I see it is everyone on this planet now has 2 main choices of indoctrines to believe in. Science and religion. I chose to believe in science for the longest time, but stopped when I realized one question just gave rise to another question, and the system of science is set up in a way that will only continue to produce more, unending questions. Religion is the end to those questions. Eventually science always hits a proverbial "brick wall" that science alone can not answer, but rather needs a philosophical element in order to solve the question.

What I'm trying to do here is show an alternate perception on everything. I want to combine science with religion--the 2 doctrines of logic in this day and age together merged as one into a unified theory of everything. The main doctrines of religion I will use are of Buddhism, Judaism, Islam, Christianity, and most importantly Hinduism. Newtonian based logic that scientists now adhere to, along with the Standard Model of the Universe are the keys to solving everything. However both Newtonian logic and the Standard Model lack philosophical meaning and depth.

Science is already like a religion in the fact that you have to have faith that people before you were correct in their assertation of knowledge. Science holds people up to a more rigorous standard of logic, however it's still merely a standard of logic, and we could very well be following a flawed system of logic.

I say science, and not math. Math is the one true undeniable system. Everything else, all the categories of science, are substrates of math, and thus open to interpretation. Even physics is open to some interpretation, because the Standard Model of the Universe has yet to be finished. It's very close though.

So my hypothesis is all our scientific knowledge of the universe combined with a philosophical element.

 

[Alexicus]

As someone who's been refraining from posting much regarding your attitude, as focussing on your semi-original concepts instead (I can appreciate that being understood, and having communication regarding any formed, seemingly working, interlinked concepts which we call theories is an unrivalled intellectual joy), I simply have to reiterate what the others have said.
Earlier, you said you wished to transcend, hitting an almost divine level where you can spread teachings through peace and interaction. Ironically, however, this is not interaction, it's far too polar: one-sided. As people have said here quite endlessly, this is a two way process. These are real, conscious, knowledgeable people here obliging you with their time - quite significant amounts of it in some cases - and whilst some are hesitant to say it, others not so much, are feeling largely ignored.
We have devoted our time to you, and it's painful to observe that you appear to simply be looping in your posts and thought processes.
Read. Observe. Reply. THEN update your theories. You'll gain more from this, this way. As shall we.

There is a misunderstanding here that has stemmed from my posts. I have read all the posts, took their knowledge in, and I have revised both my writing and theory. I will no longer make posts that reflect my want for other's to follow my indoctrinate system. This is a Theory of Everything (ToE), and since everything is linked to this theory, it would make it seem like I am looping in my thought process.

DMT and other breakthrough psychedelic doses transcend you briefly into a state of pure intrinsic knowledge where you understand all the workings of the universe. However you return to a lower state of consciousness, and the state you were just in becomes almost ineffable unless you use analogies.

What I'm trying to say is I think I can describe those ineffable breakthrough doses. I have seen the Akashic Book as you guys call it and have gained wisdom from this depth of knowledge on 4 separate occasions.

I wouldn't have been able to come with this theory had it not been for drug sites like this with their user's advocating truth and knowledge.

 

[Alexicus]

Until I can convince you guys I do want to learn from you, I won't post my hypothesis here. The Great Attractor is something that I just found out about this week and is an amazing concept to talk about.

 

[drob]

What I'm trying to do here is show an alternate perception on everything. I want to combine science with religion--the 2 doctrines of logic in this day and age together merged as one into a unified theory of everything. The main doctrines of religion I will use are of Buddhism, Judaism, Islam, Christianity, and most importantly Hinduism. Newtonian based logic that scientists now adhere to, along with the Standard Model of the Universe are the keys to solving everything. However both Newtonian logic and the Standard Model lack philosophical meaning and depth.

Science is already like a religion in the fact that you have to have faith that people before you were correct in their assertation of knowledge. Science holds people up to a more rigorous standard of logic, however it's still merely a standard of logic, and we could very well be following a flawed system of logic.

I say science, and not math. Math is the one true undeniable system. Everything else, all the categories of science, are substrates of math, and thus open to interpretation. Even physics is open to some interpretation, because the Standard Model of the Universe has yet to be finished. It's very close though.

So my hypothesis is all our scientific knowledge of the universe combined with a philosophical element.

Bro, with respect, from reading your posts, Ice Cube's famous maxim "Check yourself, before you wreck yourself" is springing to mind. Perhaps go back to working on yourself as an individual a little while before solving the all-pervading mystery of the Universe. I mean, you've got to ask yourself - how much in-depth knowledge do you truthfully have on Maths, Hinduism, Judaism, Physics, yourself, Buddhism, Chemistry, Biology, Philosophy etc etc?

 

[Pup Tentacle]

Before saving the world... perhaps saving oneself is in order.

 

[Alexicus]

I'm back!

Let's start over? I won't push my hypothesis that arose from my OP.

My whole first post was me coming to the conclusion that consciousness was a force of this universe, and did not merely arise just because life happened. I posted this well knowing that it was just an idea and not well formulated. Apparently you guys did not, and misinterpreted the whole situation. I wanted your opinion on it, and I gained some insightful information, but mostly egotistical complaining that arose from my *opinion based* post.

You questioned my wisdom because of my age, yet you did not question who my teachers were. For if you did, you would learn that my teachers were everyone, and everything that has came to be. I have learned from information, and not all information resides in written tongue.

If you deny the possibility that consciousness can arise outside the individual as well, you are denying the truth of reality. And that is all my first post was trying to convey.

All space in the universe has been proven to contain energy, and matter is condensed energy, and consciousness is a frequency resulting from the electrical impulses known as thoughts that arise from the matter based brain that is the internalization of external forces. IQ as we define it is the resulting difference in frequencies at a normal, resting/sober level. Einstein had a normal brain like everyone else (size doesn't matter), but he was merely resonating at a higher frequency.

Life is anything with energy. Rocks are living, but on a different level than us. They are "dead" or anything that only is affected by external forces. Something that is "alive" has both internal and external forces acting upon it.

Drugs can increase or decrease this frequency. Drugs that decrease the frequency can result in true death (anything cns despressant based i.g. benzos, barbituates, alcohol, opiates). Drugs that increase this frequency result in ego death.

DMT is possibly the highest frequency your consciousness can achieve. Don't believe me? Look up Timothy Leary's 8 circuits of consciousness. Psychedelic drugs induce a change in your consciousness' frequency. Unlike drugs that decrease your frequency, it's near impossible to experience true death on entheogenic psychedelics. Instead you experience an ego death.

All great minds have been telling us the same message, for thousands of years, in different ways.

Don't believe me? Look up consciousness as an active force, read articles pertaining to that. Watch this video about consciousness as a force to see what I was trying to explain in previous posts.

"I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness." - Max Planck

"As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter." - Max Planck

"Both Religion and science require a belief in God. For believers, God is in the beginning, and for physicists He is at the end of all considerations… To the former He is the foundation, to the latter, the crown of the edifice of every generalized world view." - Max Planck

"All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree." - Albert Einstein

"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." - Albert Einstein

I would keep writing, but my message falls upon more deaf ears each passing post.

 

[The Traveler]

Just an observation....

Alexicus, you seem to quote a lot of other people and show links to youtube movies without explaining to us why you see the correlations between those quotes and movies and why you think that this is proof or evidence.

We can all selectively use quotes from (famous) people and make it look like they all interconnect in the same context and we can also post selective links to youtube movies and tell people to "Watch this video". However, pointing to a youtube movie and showing quotes from famous people is far from being evidence or proof, it is just another smoke screen we have to plough through to get to some understanding about your idea.

Thus far you have provided us with a lot of smoke and we still can't see the fire you are talking about. I see a lot of assumptions and the use of out of context references to (falsely) backup your claims.

And to end with "I would keep writing, but my message falls upon more deaf ears each passing post" gives me a feeling that you are still juggling with your own theory and that you are far from completing it, let alone that you completely understand it or even think it is really true.

Just an observation...


Kind regards,

The Traveler