"There is a debate as to what causes depression. One side of the field views it as a disorder. The other side views it as a normal process of chemical interaction caused by a source outside the body. Physical abuse for example."
Mental Disorder..
"A mental disorder or mental illness is a psychological pattern, potentially reflected in behavior, that is generally associated with distress or disability, and which is not considered part of normal development of a person's culture. Mental disorders are generally defined by a combination of how a person feels, acts, thinks or perceives."
Pysical abuse, sexual abuse, abandonment etc are not part of the normal development of a persons culture(unless the culture itself is sick which is a whole other thread). Depression certainly is a psychological pattern, that seems to reinforce negative feedback loops that can lead later on to imbalances in neurotransmitter levels. It is also quite possible that an imbalance of neurotransmitter levels can first occur and depression can follow.
The whole debate above is sort of silly because they are trying to make it out to be either or. Thing are not always that one sided. Sometimes things are far more complex that that.
Take the placebo effect for example..would you argue that someone who believes they will beat a disease so much that they actaully do against all odds does not have some very real physiological ramifications taking place inside of them? Of course they do.
Why does it matter if it started with some sort of emotional event outside of them or not?
The idea that you can not identify it durring at autopsy is a flimsy one to use to make a case here..because it can be shown while a person is alive that there are very real, tangible chemical differences in people with emotional trauma compared to people without past trauma on a similar scale.
Mental Disorder..
"A mental disorder or mental illness is a psychological pattern, potentially reflected in behavior, that is generally associated with distress or disability, and which is not considered part of normal development of a person's culture. Mental disorders are generally defined by a combination of how a person feels, acts, thinks or perceives."
Pysical abuse, sexual abuse, abandonment etc are not part of the normal development of a persons culture(unless the culture itself is sick which is a whole other thread). Depression certainly is a psychological pattern, that seems to reinforce negative feedback loops that can lead later on to imbalances in neurotransmitter levels. It is also quite possible that an imbalance of neurotransmitter levels can first occur and depression can follow.
The whole debate above is sort of silly because they are trying to make it out to be either or. Thing are not always that one sided. Sometimes things are far more complex that that.
Take the placebo effect for example..would you argue that someone who believes they will beat a disease so much that they actaully do against all odds does not have some very real physiological ramifications taking place inside of them? Of course they do.
Why does it matter if it started with some sort of emotional event outside of them or not?
The idea that you can not identify it durring at autopsy is a flimsy one to use to make a case here..because it can be shown while a person is alive that there are very real, tangible chemical differences in people with emotional trauma compared to people without past trauma on a similar scale.