newusername1
Established member
In an Article in the new york times, over 48 people accuse psymposia including a DMT-nexus moderator associated with psymposia, of highly unethical behaviour that destroyed their lives and careers.
Mostly through false accusations (of the most terrible things) on social media, but also by sending letters containing the most terrible false accusations to the employers of targeted people.
Sadistically, and quite telling as well, the DMT-nexus moderator and his spouse refer to these tactics as "an opportunity for learning and growth" for the people targeted.
Here are some juicy quotes:
"It's members have become feared for their ability to use social media to damage reputations and careers"
"Many asked not to be named for fear of retaliation"
"Their work is glaringly political and biased, and it relies too much on shock effect, bad-faith readings of others, and questionable assertions and assumptions"
"The group has become known for it's take-no-prisoners approach"
"They've hurt people like me ten times more than any of the good work they think they're doing"
The nexus moderator is specifically named repeatedly in this article. As someone also relying on these tactics.
There are other newspaper articles where he is also being accused of sometimes extreme physical violence, like placing potentially lethal boobytraps in squatted buildings, using hazardous chemicals and explosives.
On this site, he once claimed to have the right to destroy other peoples' personal belongings for the sake of activism because the whole concept of property is more violent to him than the destruction of property. When he was asked if this also applied to properties belonging to himself, he got extremely angry and called this question outragious and the person asking the question an agressor for threatening to destroy his property. This is putin-level hypocrisy, but seemingly, no one noticed. He also claimed that he would even be morally in the right if he would choose to murder babies, if this murdering of babies would result in something positive.
He also uses an alias that is nearly identical to that of another psychedelic researcher.
I am firmly convinced that this person is an evil, sadistic psychopath, and that he was tolerated as a moderator here, mostly out of fear. A sort of stockholm syndrome. Another nexus moderator for instance, once told me that this man always responded agressively when questioned and that it was therefore better never to question him.
He regularly preached violence here, that got seemingly unnoticed. I suspect that, as is often the case with stockholm syndrome, other moderators simply did not want to see any of this, to prevent the total shitstorm that would innevitably ensue when these posts wóuld have been questioned.
personally, i have also experienced his extreme agression. The most shocking part of this experience was that he could say the most terrible things, or could downright contradict himself every next sentence, and that no one else would ever call out his glaring hypocrisy or glaring violations of nexus guidelines. That is something that still shocks me to this day to be honest.
I love this site, but i feel i simply have to adress this, even if it would result in a suspension or ban. I won't hold any kind of grudge if i would be banned or suspended. I understand that a team of moderators cannot allow an attack on another moderator. But i just hád to adress this issue.
Mostly through false accusations (of the most terrible things) on social media, but also by sending letters containing the most terrible false accusations to the employers of targeted people.
Sadistically, and quite telling as well, the DMT-nexus moderator and his spouse refer to these tactics as "an opportunity for learning and growth" for the people targeted.
Here are some juicy quotes:
"It's members have become feared for their ability to use social media to damage reputations and careers"
"Many asked not to be named for fear of retaliation"
"Their work is glaringly political and biased, and it relies too much on shock effect, bad-faith readings of others, and questionable assertions and assumptions"
"The group has become known for it's take-no-prisoners approach"
"They've hurt people like me ten times more than any of the good work they think they're doing"
The nexus moderator is specifically named repeatedly in this article. As someone also relying on these tactics.
There are other newspaper articles where he is also being accused of sometimes extreme physical violence, like placing potentially lethal boobytraps in squatted buildings, using hazardous chemicals and explosives.
On this site, he once claimed to have the right to destroy other peoples' personal belongings for the sake of activism because the whole concept of property is more violent to him than the destruction of property. When he was asked if this also applied to properties belonging to himself, he got extremely angry and called this question outragious and the person asking the question an agressor for threatening to destroy his property. This is putin-level hypocrisy, but seemingly, no one noticed. He also claimed that he would even be morally in the right if he would choose to murder babies, if this murdering of babies would result in something positive.
He also uses an alias that is nearly identical to that of another psychedelic researcher.
I am firmly convinced that this person is an evil, sadistic psychopath, and that he was tolerated as a moderator here, mostly out of fear. A sort of stockholm syndrome. Another nexus moderator for instance, once told me that this man always responded agressively when questioned and that it was therefore better never to question him.
He regularly preached violence here, that got seemingly unnoticed. I suspect that, as is often the case with stockholm syndrome, other moderators simply did not want to see any of this, to prevent the total shitstorm that would innevitably ensue when these posts wóuld have been questioned.
personally, i have also experienced his extreme agression. The most shocking part of this experience was that he could say the most terrible things, or could downright contradict himself every next sentence, and that no one else would ever call out his glaring hypocrisy or glaring violations of nexus guidelines. That is something that still shocks me to this day to be honest.
I love this site, but i feel i simply have to adress this, even if it would result in a suspension or ban. I won't hold any kind of grudge if i would be banned or suspended. I understand that a team of moderators cannot allow an attack on another moderator. But i just hád to adress this issue.
