The core-believe that we're in a reality not created by ourselves.
-
Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).
Experiment/Game
- Thread starter fink
- Start date
I'd imagine by then everyone would have a digital twin, you send a voice/text/thought, your digital twin will deliver in video format. Not the most energy efficient but that is not on top of our priority list yet.
I too remember when the internet was invented rkba! It does seem now that most humans prefer text for long or difficult communications.
Most people seem to prefer a text message to a phone call
Am I the only one counting? Some of y'all went over 35.. tsk. tsk. LOL
In a world where that could occur, I would imagine it to be a peaceful world.
In a world where that could occur, I would imagine it to be a peaceful world.
Climate change aside, since when was the weather not serious?
I'm on it from my side and have been remaining on the strait and narrow 35 max. I even count emojis!
Maybe without shops?
LuxObscura
Titanium Teammate
It reminds me of Wittgenstein's language games, concepts follow rules, yet interpretation shapes their use.
Even applying rules is subjective.
Still, it works, and the process can be enjoyable, strict or not.
Even applying rules is subjective.
Still, it works, and the process can be enjoyable, strict or not.
In what way is counting to thirty five subjective?
I'm not really up to speed on philosophers.
LuxObscura
Titanium Teammate
Based on the rules I would need and like to have a second person requesting more information regarding this point.
Give us more, don't leave us hanging!
LuxObscura
Titanium Teammate
From a philosophy of language perspective, the question of whether emojis count as a "word" is quite interesting.
Even if one were to classify an emoji as a word, it could still convey far more than a single word's worth of meaning.
Yet, the meanings themselves cannot be counted in the same way, even though the emoji itself can be quantified.
From a definitional standpoint, one could argue that a word is fundamentally different from an emoji.
But as already observed earlier in this thread, even long messages can be split across several smaller ones.
Or quoted messages can be included or excluded, depending on interpretation.
But at the end of the day, it serves a purpose.
The purpose I personally see here is that limiting the number of words sparks interest.
And when curiosity is sparked, requesting more information allows for a flow to emerge.
A flow that might lead into a larger body of water.
And from that body of water, new branches and directions may unfold.
What’s fascinating is that the rules themselves create a kind of game.
This game follows rules, but each person may carry their own understanding of those rules.
One could even say the game itself regulates its own rule making process.
Even if one were to classify an emoji as a word, it could still convey far more than a single word's worth of meaning.
Yet, the meanings themselves cannot be counted in the same way, even though the emoji itself can be quantified.
From a definitional standpoint, one could argue that a word is fundamentally different from an emoji.
But as already observed earlier in this thread, even long messages can be split across several smaller ones.
Or quoted messages can be included or excluded, depending on interpretation.
But at the end of the day, it serves a purpose.
The purpose I personally see here is that limiting the number of words sparks interest.
And when curiosity is sparked, requesting more information allows for a flow to emerge.
A flow that might lead into a larger body of water.
And from that body of water, new branches and directions may unfold.
What’s fascinating is that the rules themselves create a kind of game.
This game follows rules, but each person may carry their own understanding of those rules.
One could even say the game itself regulates its own rule making process.
At least this isn't fight club!
Do you work in advertising? The bit about raising interest set me thinking that way.
LuxObscura
Titanium Teammate
Can those who understand the rules also bypass or break them without actually breaking or bypassing them?
"There is no spoon"
-Matrix
"There is no spoon"
-Matrix
Maybe we can by speaking German, or some other language where one can clump words together into monstrous agglomerations. Are we obliged to speak in proper sentences? Can we post 12-hour-long videos?
Maybe create a language where each concept requires a PhD to unpack...
Your wisdom blew my mind
Last edited:
What I said was not intended to imply I can actually understand any of themUtkuáloq akzha'lûk
I doubt the AI translated it correctly, so I edited the original message.What I said was not intended to imply I can actually understand any of them
Mīl qūy kwařsël tsej.What I said was not intended to imply I can actually understand any of them
Similar threads
