downwardsfromzero
Boundary condition
Very, very lovely! A girl's best friend?truthone said:diamonds from lime tek...
Very, very lovely! A girl's best friend?truthone said:diamonds from lime tek...
biopsylo said:i want to shrink myself to 1/2 the size of one of those 'diamonds' and chop it up with a light saber
Came here this morning to see the active discussions entirely populated with one line lol style posts from you eaglepath. Padding your post number is not necessary nor will it help you gain anything.Eaglepath said:biopsylo said:i want to shrink myself to 1/2 the size of one of those 'diamonds' and chop it up with a light saber
Hahahahaha and more hahahaahh moooore hahahahaahah
Dr. Masaru emoto studies water crystal formation under different emotional influences, and from different water sources and he claims to have proven scientifically that they store conscious energy, and said energy effects crystal structure and formation.CaptainFuture said:Thanks!burnt said:The only way crystal structure is going to alter the potency is if it somehow alters the vaporization rate or decomposition rate of dmt during smoking.
Well, I did melt them inside the machine bubbler wire, same as with all of the other crystals I used, so same vape rate, I'd say.
All this talk about energy being locked up in diamond crystals doesn't make sense.
Well, thats your opinion. There definitely is energy in crystals. F.e. piezo in quartz crystals. Guess why you're CPU works for you?
Also its quite normal that different kinds of crystals come from different solvents and different purity extracts.
Like I said, SAME solvent in any re-x used. And I had clear crystals growing with the 'common' crystals type, too. But like I said I will test if the diamond shape is built out of more pure DMT molecules.
This is well known with almost any substance one purifies. This is why when people describe molecules in scientific literature the physical description (ie 'long white needles' or whatever) is always written with the solvent used for crystallization.
In my case the same solvent from the same canister brought up different crystals shapes.
Either way awesome specimens.
I had no intention of presenting that as a fact. I said he claims to have proven. I've seen a little of his work and found interesting in a kinda silly way, but never tried to make any conclusions. By proven false, what exactly do you mean? He falsified results? His experiments weren't conducted under proper conditions? Did someone else grow pretty crystals while under a rage?Seeingisbelieving said:Bisy, stop spreading false information. Dr. Emoto's claims have been proven false multiple times.
Bisy said:I had no intention of presenting that as a fact. I said he claims to have proven. I've seen a little of his work and found interesting in a kinda silly way, but never tried to make any conclusions. By proven false, what exactly do you mean? He falsified results? His experiments weren't conducted under proper conditions? Did someone else grow pretty crystals while under a rage?Seeingisbelieving said:Bisy, stop spreading false information. Dr. Emoto's claims have been proven false multiple times.
Bisy said:What you might not realize quite yet about me, and my opinions, is that they are nearly always open. Regarding mr. Emoto, (he wasnt a doctor either) i tend mostly to agree with you so far on everything EXCEPT your certainty regarding his expirements..
Let me back up a minute and point out the quote to which I was responding..it was much like the conversation we are having in which it appears to be between a scientific thinking person and a person who wants to believe consciousness exists in everything and can be influenced by individuals or collectively.
Now, moving on, is there not a theory that says something about particles only existing somewhere if there is someone there to observe them or something like that? I know there is, but I might not have it quite right.
Anyway, what Mr emoto is suggesting would also suggest that someone intending to debunk his experiment would in fact do so if his claims are true. Intention is what he claims to be the force driving his theory.