It's time to start. I won't be paranoid anymore.
Delete my IP address please after this.
This is a rough draft. But I'm done with it. here. someone else have it. Rip it apart prove it all wrong. BUT I WON'T SIT ON IT ANYMORE OK.
911 convert thread.
Some of you may have seen some of the agnostic 911 films. That say that we don't know the full extent of what did or did not happen that day, and that we need a new investigation. I think this is impotency at this point. Now, there are some wild theories are out there. Holograms? Special weapons used to bring down the towers? Controlled demolition. Pentagon strikes, Flight 93 Shanksville ect.
This will be a lesson in sight, where I ask rhetorical questions, and then you look at what I say, along with the video evidence and try and see what you see. See what really happened, see what's really there. This is a new way to look at it, that I believe is being censored because it can blast through all of the cognitive dissonance and critical questions and slew of contradictions that come to mind any time someone mentions 911.
I want to blast through your defenses.
Ready.
Video 1.
First watch this one. And assume this guy is just brilliant, and he's all over it. He see's it burns with passion as he speaks the truth. He is... he's the guy we should all be listening to. So turn up the volume and just listen, maybe get stoned before you listen. I find cannabis greatly helps listening and seeing skills.
Ok are you high yet. Smoke out if you can.
Now watch.
Hmm now that's something. A jet... made of aluminum can't make those holes? So that would on the face of it disprove 911?
Well you say what about all those planes we saw. OVER AND OVER. those planes and videos. Well lets put physics the back burner for a second and go straight to rather strange phone call to a man named Michael Hezarkhani. Here's what you saw on 9/11 from Michael Helzinki. The famous shot shown on CNN where the jet banks
And Jeffs call to this man.
The overlay you are seeing is from film shot in battery park. Further research has proved this shot to be impossible. The angles and location for example do not exist. Another eyewitness is called and questioned by Jeff this time at 1 am.
Here's another reliable witness who had a hard time describing what he saw.
Hmmm. Dude sounds scared, doesn't want to talk about it much. Jeff has also made several other calls worth listening to. just google pumpitout.
Well maybe we can rely on some of those live shots. They had helicopters and stuff right. They got a good look at what hit right?
Just let the video speak for itself.
Maybe a bit of agnosticism resides about those pesky planes? After all they found parts in the street and stuff.
Ok, watch this.
Yeah. Proof positive they goofed with videos.
Well... now lets jump right back into physics.
But not first without comparing a real video shot from Battery Park, to the cartoon video generated on 911 whose location does not physically exit. This is a parody put to the soundtrack from Michael Hezerdickhead (the gem dealer)'s fake video showing seagulls crash into a building near battery park. Pretty silly right, with the goofy camera movements and all.
Bet you want to take another good look at Michael's fake video. Here it is stabilized.
Pretty amazing. Not sure what you're seeing still? I mean it still looks kind of convincing right?
Here's a video of a real crash at 500mph
Now here's the kicker. compare the melting plane to the impacting plane...
... but first not without reviewing some birdstrikes to aircrafts. ready.
bsA
bsB
bsC
bsD
Or maybe the inside of an aircraft.
inA
inB
Or maybe some crash footage? (cool crash footage)
where wings get cut through at medium speed.
ccf1
ccf2
ccf3
Delete my IP address please after this.
This is a rough draft. But I'm done with it. here. someone else have it. Rip it apart prove it all wrong. BUT I WON'T SIT ON IT ANYMORE OK.
911 convert thread.
Some of you may have seen some of the agnostic 911 films. That say that we don't know the full extent of what did or did not happen that day, and that we need a new investigation. I think this is impotency at this point. Now, there are some wild theories are out there. Holograms? Special weapons used to bring down the towers? Controlled demolition. Pentagon strikes, Flight 93 Shanksville ect.
This will be a lesson in sight, where I ask rhetorical questions, and then you look at what I say, along with the video evidence and try and see what you see. See what really happened, see what's really there. This is a new way to look at it, that I believe is being censored because it can blast through all of the cognitive dissonance and critical questions and slew of contradictions that come to mind any time someone mentions 911.
I want to blast through your defenses.
Ready.
Video 1.
First watch this one. And assume this guy is just brilliant, and he's all over it. He see's it burns with passion as he speaks the truth. He is... he's the guy we should all be listening to. So turn up the volume and just listen, maybe get stoned before you listen. I find cannabis greatly helps listening and seeing skills.
Ok are you high yet. Smoke out if you can.
Now watch.
Hmm now that's something. A jet... made of aluminum can't make those holes? So that would on the face of it disprove 911?
Well you say what about all those planes we saw. OVER AND OVER. those planes and videos. Well lets put physics the back burner for a second and go straight to rather strange phone call to a man named Michael Hezarkhani. Here's what you saw on 9/11 from Michael Helzinki. The famous shot shown on CNN where the jet banks
And Jeffs call to this man.
Here's another reliable witness who had a hard time describing what he saw.
Hmmm. Dude sounds scared, doesn't want to talk about it much. Jeff has also made several other calls worth listening to. just google pumpitout.
Well maybe we can rely on some of those live shots. They had helicopters and stuff right. They got a good look at what hit right?
Maybe a bit of agnosticism resides about those pesky planes? After all they found parts in the street and stuff.
Ok, watch this.
Well... now lets jump right back into physics.
But not first without comparing a real video shot from Battery Park, to the cartoon video generated on 911 whose location does not physically exit. This is a parody put to the soundtrack from Michael Hezerdickhead (the gem dealer)'s fake video showing seagulls crash into a building near battery park. Pretty silly right, with the goofy camera movements and all.
Bet you want to take another good look at Michael's fake video. Here it is stabilized.
Pretty amazing. Not sure what you're seeing still? I mean it still looks kind of convincing right?
Here's a video of a real crash at 500mph
Now here's the kicker. compare the melting plane to the impacting plane...
... but first not without reviewing some birdstrikes to aircrafts. ready.
bsA
bsB
bsC
bsD
Or maybe the inside of an aircraft.
inA
inB
Or maybe some crash footage? (cool crash footage)
where wings get cut through at medium speed.
ccf1
ccf2
ccf3