• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Sprouting morning glory first?

tregar said:
The Aojiru young barley grass powder supplies extremely high levels of the 3 aldehydes: isovaleraldehyde, valeraldehyde, and crotonaldehyde which condense onto the amide of LSA when stirred for 10 minutes in tartaric acid acidified water, forming a 2oz brew containing Lysergic Acid Isovaleraldamide, Lysergic Acid Valeraldamide, and Lysergic Acid Crotonaldamide for a triple psychedelic combination just as powerful as LSD
Sorry to say, but the highlighted names are using made up nomenclature. These claims also require some analytical evidence to back them up.

For me the main question might be whether anyone is going to attempt to get hold of the book he's promoting, since it could do with a peer-review.

A PDF would do, I can offer my expert proof-reading skills by way of exchange ;) @tregar @ava69 @Matthew Stahl …
 
A couple of quotes:
tregar, you can't use science just when it suits your pre-conceived beliefs, but ignore all the science whenever it goes against your ideas.

The problem is not that you have a theory or belief, even if it goes against scientific reasoning. You are totally allowed to express them, and I actually think it's good to think outside the box. The problem is that you disguise these beliefs and speculations as if they are scientific truths, using absolute words ("this is happening" "it is..." ) and burying this in long posts between unrelated or misinterpeted sources and quotes from other places.

And whenever your ideas are questioned with logic and scientific reasoning, you refuse to answer the specific points, which is the only way this can be a productive conversation, and rather hide behind "try it and you´ll see" or use some other sort of logical fallacy (that such and such person or culture liked that combination, for example)

If you would be clear these are your beliefs or hypothesis, with disclaimers and not absolute words, and also you'd respond to the specific counter arguments brought by others, I'd love your posts and your desire to experiment, to have direct experiences with things, to think outside the box, to try to innovate. I'd be excitedly reading this thread and congratulating you and others involved on the discussion.

Instead, because of the issues mentioned above, what is happening is this thread is going away from the quality of information required in our attitude page, and we're having to step in and say these things here, maybe generating some discomfort.

I hope you understand this is not a personal attack, i mean this in a constructive way and hope we can transform this into a productive discussion in line with this community's standards

Dear me, the bullshit in that thread…
100% evidence that it's the (multiple-times) banned member @tregar

Probably got his PM function suspended pre-emptively if any of the admins there knew anything what he's like, basically a serious security risk.

It does seem that the claim of having single-handedly "invented" the harmaline to THH zinc conversion also identifies him as being @69ron, although he comes across as an inveterate bullshitter so a healthy pinch of salt also seems required with that one. Zinc reduction is a laboratory method almost as old as chemistry itself, btw.

As for concealing the identity of the isovaleraldehyde-containing plant-admixture for proprietary purposes (i.e., publishing a book), that's simply pathetic, as well as going against the Nexus ethos of 'Learn-Share-Expand'.
I'm sure we can dig up the identity of the plant and share this knowledge accordingly (like on wikipedia, etc.)
(Apols for slight derailment, but this needs to be made clear.)
 
This pretty much summed it up for me. If you read it thoroughly he openly states offering and selling his concoctions internationally to those interested because "they work." Highly suspicious behavior on their part.

TEK - LSI, Ancient LSD, Secret of the Eleusis Kykeon and Vedic SOMA
Right, I wouldn't be at all surprised to find he has a sack of HBWR and a crate of Japanese barley grass he needs to be getting rid of, not to mention whatever else he'd be selling behind that front. As well as, presumably, tartaric acid.

It should also be noted that crotonaldehyde is recognized as being an extremely hazardous substance, btw.
 
Tregar's recipe is quite simple:

The LSI brew consists of 60ml (2 oz) water with the dissolved LSA extract from the seeds combined with 40mg tartaric acid powder (used in wine making and baking available worldwide) and 3 grams of Japanese Aojiru barley powder, all of which is stirred for 10 minutes, then consumed.

Should be easy to comment for anybody with chemistry background.
 
Tregar's recipe is quite simple:

The LSI brew consists of 60ml (2 oz) water with the dissolved LSA extract from the seeds combined with 40mg tartaric acid powder (used in wine making and baking available worldwide) and 3 grams of Japanese Aojiru barley powder, all of which is stirred for 10 minutes, then consumed.

Should be easy to comment for anybody with chemistry background.
It's nominally replicable, the issue is with speculative identification of putative active compounds.
 
Tregar never provided any proof for his great molecules, prepared by mixing seeds with whatever, so let's not expect anything.

I would really like to know someday more about him and his group. 😀
 
moderator -> remove if too much synthesis talk


The interesting question here for me is - what enzymes can be found in these grasses or malted barley for example that could make the aldehydes to join the amine (NH2) and be further reduced from imine to form the modified amine?

As far as I'm aware the creation of LSD happens via activation of carboxlyic acid group on the lysergic acid which is then joined together with the desired amine - for example diethylamine to make LSD - making the amide bond in the process. Here what should happen is that the aldehyde should join on the amine group already in place. Are there any known enzymes that can do this process?
 
Tregar never provided any proof for his great molecules, prepared by mixing seeds with whatever, so let's not expect anything.

I would really like to know someday more about him and his group. 😀
Yeah, the way he also hammered on about the sublingual HPBCD complexed pharmahuasca like it was literal angels' milk or whatever, only for everyone else to find it unreliable and underwhelming at best really set the tone poorly for this latest excursion of his. Although, "latest" might be too generous since it's merely the culmination of about seven years of highly repetitive spamming. Mea culpa a bit on fanning the flames, but in fairness, at least some of the concepts are quite interesting. And I did buy myself a pack of barleygrass powder earlier on 😂

We'll see, we'll see…
 
moderator -> remove if too much synthesis talk


The interesting question here for me is - what enzymes can be found in these grasses or malted barley for example that could make the aldehydes to join the amine (NH2) and be further reduced from imine to form the modified amine?

As far as I'm aware the creation of LSD happens via activation of carboxlyic acid group on the lysergic acid which is then joined together with the desired amine - for example diethylamine to make LSD - making the amide bond in the process. Here what should happen is that the aldehyde should join on the amine group already in place. Are there any known enzymes that can do this process?
Yes, aminotransferases of certain varieties do almost exactly this, although it tends to be only the amine group that gets swapped, via imine rearrangement, from an amino acid onto an awaiting aldehyde or (more usually) keto acid, giving the new amin(e/o acid) and the corresponding keto acid from the original amino acid, e.g. the classic being pyruvate + glutamate ⇌ alanine + β-ketoglutarate. And yes, it's an equilibrium.

As far as I'm aware, this type of amine metathesis where an aldehyde effectively gets reductively aminated is rare to nonexistent in biological systems, but I'm more than happy to be proven wrong with a documented example.
 
There's a specific point amongst tregar's ramblings, repeated over the various forums as well as on Hancock's menagerie of weirdness where I've taken this quote from:
tregar said:
3) This aldehyde — isovaleraldehyde also looks exactly like the tail end of DMT and psilocin, with the same chemical formula of CHO CH2 CH2 2(CH3).
Sadly, this only serves to highlight the kind of misguided thinking the poor fellow all too often indulges in. Firstly, he's written the formula out incorrectly: it should be
(O)CHCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ which, formally regarded, is kind of backwards (he did literally write it out almost entirely backwards!) so, more typically actually (CH₃)₂CHCH₂CHO
Anyhow, the point is that likening this structure to the side chain of DMT or psilocin is utterly ridiculous, especially from a point of view of pharmacology - the sidechain nitrogen atom of the latter two molecules plays a crucial role in their receptor activity and can't be replaced by a carbon atom in something that looks vaguely similar.

And why's he not likening it to other dimethylaminoethyl-whatevers like hordenine or trichocerine, eh? Maybe because neither of those molecules display an activity as psychedelrcs.

Sorry to drag this up all here, but this Matthew Stahl guy is presenting misinformation in public and has something of a track record to be aware of.

Maybe I should collect these points of information into a separate thread and stop spamming this one in the style of the aforementioned…
 
Back
Top Bottom