tregar, you can't use science just when it suits your pre-conceived beliefs, but ignore all the science whenever it goes against your ideas.
The problem is not that you have a theory or belief, even if it goes against scientific reasoning. You are totally allowed to express them, and I actually think it's good to think outside the box. The problem is that you disguise these beliefs and speculations as if they are scientific truths, using absolute words ("this is happening" "it is..." ) and burying this in long posts between unrelated or misinterpeted sources and quotes from other places.
And whenever your ideas are questioned with logic and scientific reasoning, you refuse to answer the specific points, which is the only way this can be a productive conversation, and rather hide behind "try it and you´ll see" or use some other sort of logical fallacy (that such and such person or culture liked that combination, for example)
If you would be clear these are your beliefs or hypothesis, with disclaimers and not absolute words, and also you'd respond to the specific counter arguments brought by others, I'd love your posts and your desire to experiment, to have direct experiences with things, to think outside the box, to try to innovate. I'd be excitedly reading this thread and congratulating you and others involved on the discussion.
Instead, because of the issues mentioned above, what is happening is this thread is going away from the
quality of information required in our attitude page, and we're having to step in and say these things here, maybe generating some discomfort.
I hope you understand this is not a personal attack, i mean this in a constructive way and hope we can transform this into a productive discussion in line with this community's standards