My recent work career has involved IT for my local university. After relocating a year ago I've been doing some building work, and some freelance writing. I am now ready to put a new 10 year plan into effect and I am going to start by studying for a degree, then progress down the academic route and hopefully do some work related to entheogens, a few years down the line.
I have two ideas of which route I wish to take, I've been balancing the pros and cons but I can't make a decision. I'm wondering if some input or advice from my fellow Nexians could help me make a decision.
I want to either study Psychology or Philosophy of Psychology/Philosophy of Mind. If I study Psychology then perhaps I would be biased in any future entheogen research work I do, as I am a proponent of entheogens. If I study more from a Philosophical stand point, then maybe my research will not be considered as concrete or reliable, and I'd just be someone putting out ideas rather than breaking any ground.
My use of entheogens makes me think that the Philosophy route is more fitting, as pursuit of ideas and understanding is part of the whole reason I use entheogens as a tool. The Psychology route might add more weight to any future research I may carry out, though this could be deemed more clinical, and not in line my own personal use of entheogens.
Perhaps it doesn't matter which route I take and I could do some work in either field, with equal standing (good or bad) and I'm thinking to much into the situation, and looking at it in black and white. Either way, if anyone out there could give me any advice, opinions or other input I would be very grateful.
Peace
Macre
I have two ideas of which route I wish to take, I've been balancing the pros and cons but I can't make a decision. I'm wondering if some input or advice from my fellow Nexians could help me make a decision.
I want to either study Psychology or Philosophy of Psychology/Philosophy of Mind. If I study Psychology then perhaps I would be biased in any future entheogen research work I do, as I am a proponent of entheogens. If I study more from a Philosophical stand point, then maybe my research will not be considered as concrete or reliable, and I'd just be someone putting out ideas rather than breaking any ground.
My use of entheogens makes me think that the Philosophy route is more fitting, as pursuit of ideas and understanding is part of the whole reason I use entheogens as a tool. The Psychology route might add more weight to any future research I may carry out, though this could be deemed more clinical, and not in line my own personal use of entheogens.
Perhaps it doesn't matter which route I take and I could do some work in either field, with equal standing (good or bad) and I'm thinking to much into the situation, and looking at it in black and white. Either way, if anyone out there could give me any advice, opinions or other input I would be very grateful.
Peace
Macre