Sure. That's why we came up for a term for it. It was something experienced by enough people that a vocabulary was developed to express the experience of "sweetness."Would we know what sweet was, if we didn’t have a word for it?
One love
Sure. That's why we came up for a term for it. It was something experienced by enough people that a vocabulary was developed to express the experience of "sweetness."Would we know what sweet was, if we didn’t have a word for it?
Great example! I've encountered all too many people who don't know the difference between bitter and sour. This falls under the qualia problem.Would we know what sweet was, if we didn’t have a word for it?
I wonder if there's something going on a sensorial level like what occurs with colorblindness that can affect this.Great example! I've encountered all too many people who don't know the difference between bitter and sour. This falls under the qualia problem.
Possibly, or they may simply have become confused by the beverage product known as "bitter lemon" [soda]. This also makes me think of muscular isolations (sort of), in that the 'taste conflation' could have occured at a central level. Learning how to isolate specific muscular control involves the mapping of cognitive effort onto motor neurones and subsequent interpretation of the proprioceptive feedback. OK, that's not quite the same as interpreting a gustatory (+ olfactory) input and mapping it to a linguistic correlate, but there surely is an intrinsic latent neuromuscular correlate of the linguistic concept on account of the inextricable relationship between words and the physical act of speech (I'll leave out reading and writing for the sake of simplicity).I wonder if there's something going on a sensorial level like what occurs with colorblindness that can affect this.
One love
The hook present without a tag!Would we know what sweet was, if we didn’t have a word for it?
The hook present without a tag!
![]()
A hook is just a phenomena, a tag just a perception. We travel in a vehicle made out of perceptions on a journey through consciousness, ever expanding into the Void.Aaaah yes, a universe of hooks. Sounds like a great song. Maybe a little overbearing!
A hook is just a phenomena, a tag just a perception. We travel in a vehicle made out of perceptions on a journey through consciousness, ever expanding into the Void.
Ooo that's a good one too.I was assuming hooks were the sensations (perceptions), and the tags are how we choose to describe them?
Would the idea that we're traveling in a vehicle be a perception? I guess a perception of a perception, or from the other end, an atomic perception? And would conscious be considered a phenomena? A phenomena that can phenomenologically reflect on its phenomenal aspect?A hook is just a phenomena, a tag just a perception. We travel in a vehicle made out of perceptions on a journey through consciousness, ever expanding into the Void.
Indeed a metaphor. I'm trying to understand @rkba metaphysical system using analogies and metaphors of hooks and tags. I'm seeing what happens when we introduce some self reference.
Not really, I think.Friends, are we basically speaking about the difference in between 'subjective' (sensory) and 'objective' (expressable) experience, maybe...? Or in other words: Are we debating the question, whether our left hemisphere is affecting the right?
Okay, maybe I wasn't clear enough:Not really, I think.
More about language being constitutive in defining the human experience.
This isn't quite what objective and subjective are.Friends, are we basically speaking about the difference in between 'subjective' (sensory) and 'objective' (expressable) experience, maybe...? Or in other words: Are we debating the question, whether our left hemisphere is affecting the right?
Langue is far more than that.Okay, maybe I wasn't clear enough:
Language= objects and their relation (logic) - also called 'relative' aspect of reality
Human experience= subjective stream of sensations e.g. 'absolute' aspect of reality
Okay, maybe I wasn't clear enough:
Language= objects and their relation (logic) - also called 'relative' aspect of reality
Human experience= subjective stream of sensations e.g. 'absolute' aspect of reality
I was assuming hooks were the sensations (perceptions), and the tags are how we choose to describe them?
Would the idea that we're traveling in a vehicle be a perception? I guess a perception of a perception, or from the other end, an atomic perception? And would conscious be considered a phenomena? A phenomena that can phenomenologically reflect on its phenomenal aspect?
I'm trying to understand @rkba metaphysical system using analogies and metaphors of hooks and tags.
More about language being constitutive in defining the human experience.