• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Implication of language on perception of reality?

I wonder if there's something going on a sensorial level like what occurs with colorblindness that can affect this.

One love
Possibly, or they may simply have become confused by the beverage product known as "bitter lemon" [soda]. This also makes me think of muscular isolations (sort of), in that the 'taste conflation' could have occured at a central level. Learning how to isolate specific muscular control involves the mapping of cognitive effort onto motor neurones and subsequent interpretation of the proprioceptive feedback. OK, that's not quite the same as interpreting a gustatory (+ olfactory) input and mapping it to a linguistic correlate, but there surely is an intrinsic latent neuromuscular correlate of the linguistic concept on account of the inextricable relationship between words and the physical act of speech (I'll leave out reading and writing for the sake of simplicity).
 
A hook is just a phenomena, a tag just a perception. We travel in a vehicle made out of perceptions on a journey through consciousness, ever expanding into the Void.
Would the idea that we're traveling in a vehicle be a perception? I guess a perception of a perception, or from the other end, an atomic perception? And would conscious be considered a phenomena? A phenomena that can phenomenologically reflect on its phenomenal aspect?

One love
 
Friends, are we basically speaking about the difference in between 'subjective' (sensory) and 'objective' (expressable) experience, maybe...? Or in other words: Are we debating the question, whether our left hemisphere is affecting the right?
 
Friends, are we basically speaking about the difference in between 'subjective' (sensory) and 'objective' (expressable) experience, maybe...? Or in other words: Are we debating the question, whether our left hemisphere is affecting the right?
Not really, I think.
More about language being constitutive in defining the human experience.
 
Not really, I think.
More about language being constitutive in defining the human experience.
Okay, maybe I wasn't clear enough:
Language= objects and their relation (logic) - also called 'relative' aspect of reality
Human experience= subjective stream of sensations e.g. 'absolute' aspect of reality
 
Friends, are we basically speaking about the difference in between 'subjective' (sensory) and 'objective' (expressable) experience, maybe...? Or in other words: Are we debating the question, whether our left hemisphere is affecting the right?
This isn't quite what objective and subjective are.

Subjectivity involves our own phenomenology, objectivity, which we never really obtain is what is the case outside out perception of it. Ie what is what without what we think about it.

Okay, maybe I wasn't clear enough:
Language= objects and their relation (logic) - also called 'relative' aspect of reality
Human experience= subjective stream of sensations e.g. 'absolute' aspect of reality
Langue is far more than that.

Human experience is far more than that.

❤️

One love
 
Okay, maybe I wasn't clear enough:
Language= objects and their relation (logic) - also called 'relative' aspect of reality
Human experience= subjective stream of sensations e.g. 'absolute' aspect of reality

As @Voidmatrix said, a bit shallow as definitions?
Language is also embodied, performed, for one thing. Exceeds what you call (inert?) ‘objects and their relation’, or at least it animates it.
Human experience isn’t just subjective. Intersubjective too, I’d think.

I don’t know what you mean by ‘reality’. ;)
 
I was assuming hooks were the sensations (perceptions), and the tags are how we choose to describe them?

Yeah, I'm losing track of my own ramblings. LOL.

Time for another fire 🔥, however not all fire-sessions are inspiring. Maybe not the right wood/woodfungi (😱) or maybe not the right vibrational state of being.

Yes, perceptions can be represented by hooks and by tagging them we create our reality. That resonates really well with me.

Would the idea that we're traveling in a vehicle be a perception? I guess a perception of a perception, or from the other end, an atomic perception? And would conscious be considered a phenomena? A phenomena that can phenomenologically reflect on its phenomenal aspect?

The way it feels for me is that our consciousness is a trip/voyage/journey and we experience the trip by 'looking out'. Out are phenomena that we perceive with our perceptions and in order to create something out of a phenomenon we 'tag' this perception. After a perception is tagged it becomes included into the reality of our Being.

It's all still very fluid and it seems to pop up in my mind in periodical waves. Sometimes things click, other times they don't. It's kind of erratic, seemingly like the fluttering of a butterfly. But, I have been shown by the butterflies that the flight of a butterfly is everything but erratic. So I have come to accept the seemingly erratic tagging of perceptions within my Being.

I'm trying to understand @rkba metaphysical system using analogies and metaphors of hooks and tags.

Me too. 😁

I do like the reflections that are bouncing back from the forum! In a way it forces me to organize my own chaotic ramblings.

More about language being constitutive in defining the human experience.

But one can surely have a human experience without any language. It will be a drastically different cultural dimension, for sure.

---

Deep down it feels to me that our organizing tendencies are blocking our path to find our true selves. And sometimes I think that the animals around us are actually more in tune with themselves than we are.

However, maybe being out of tune allows us to be conscious and allows us to program our own tune and create whatever we would like to create. Whatever voyage we would like. And for that we may need language, because the trip is formed over many human lifecycles and builds upon itself.

I also think that we have a 'language' inside ourselves that is currently underutilized. It's not a spoken language, but a felt language. A language created by our heart. We just need to learn to 'listen' to it, become fluent with it. Who knows what perceptual doors can be opened once one becomes fluent in both languages.

I'm rambling again, its cold outside and this fire feels and smells good!
🦋
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20250108_201723.jpg
    IMG_20250108_201723.jpg
    2.4 MB · Views: 3
Back
Top Bottom