The clinical picture that longterm frequent ketamine use produces with respect to the urinary tract (especially the bladder) is very similar to a medical condition called interstitial cystitis.Heres an intersting MSc thesis rerlating to this:
http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/2104/1/Khurram_Shahzad_MSc_Thesis.pdf
Depending on the users intentions/pattern of us, I think that the dissociatives can be a very useful class of compounds due to the nature of the headspace they impart.IMO/E one can certainly go very far with them, and theres a 'therapeutic window' in which much good work can be done in terms of gaining insights into oneself.The emotional detachment they elicit can allow those shadier crannies of ones psyche to be inspected without evoking the emotional turmoil which the classic psychedelics are able/prone to evoke.
I also think that very infrequent use allows the positive aspects of the experience to remain evident.The thing that ketamine has in its favor, IMO, is the short duration of the experience when used IM.DXM is a longer haul and subjectively feels more toxic than K if you were to just have 1 dose of each (but not at the same time!).MXE is a smoother affair if you're within the therapeutic window than either K or DXM, and it has some additional opioid-like effects which to my mind make it the disso-of-choice if access to only one agent of the class were permitted.This, I think, is what makes it a riskier proposition than the others leading to injudicious patterns of use.
http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/2104/1/Khurram_Shahzad_MSc_Thesis.pdf
Depending on the users intentions/pattern of us, I think that the dissociatives can be a very useful class of compounds due to the nature of the headspace they impart.IMO/E one can certainly go very far with them, and theres a 'therapeutic window' in which much good work can be done in terms of gaining insights into oneself.The emotional detachment they elicit can allow those shadier crannies of ones psyche to be inspected without evoking the emotional turmoil which the classic psychedelics are able/prone to evoke.
I also think that very infrequent use allows the positive aspects of the experience to remain evident.The thing that ketamine has in its favor, IMO, is the short duration of the experience when used IM.DXM is a longer haul and subjectively feels more toxic than K if you were to just have 1 dose of each (but not at the same time!).MXE is a smoother affair if you're within the therapeutic window than either K or DXM, and it has some additional opioid-like effects which to my mind make it the disso-of-choice if access to only one agent of the class were permitted.This, I think, is what makes it a riskier proposition than the others leading to injudicious patterns of use.