LevitatingGod said:Despite me saying I extracted 50g extracts for majority of my time extracting, I stated most material ever used was trial and error to create my own tek.
Also, I would take a CERN physicist telling me transmutation is real as more credible that you telling me it's psudeoscience.
In March 1924, at the Tokyo Imperial University, Professor Hantaro Nagaoka directed 150,000 volts of electricity at a mercury isotope under a dialectic layer of paraffin oil for four hours in an early experiment with nuclear energy. The purpose was to strike out a hydrogen proton from the nucleus of the mercury and produce a new element, gold. Mercury has 80 protons. Gold, meanwhile, has 79 protons — you see where I’m going with this.The experiment was a success. Professor Hantaro Nagaoka solved the mystery that eluded scientists for centuries, the mystery of the Philosopher’s Stone.
The Philosopher’s Stone is the idea that you could have a magical material that could turn lead, or some very inexpensive metal, into gold. For thousands of years, kings sought out this mythical device, one that could create gold out of common metals. Scientists and alchemists for centuries have been trying to invent one. Even Sir Isaac Newton obsessed over the mystery of the Philosopher’s Stone in the 17th century. However, the English feared the potential devaluation of gold and made the practice of alchemy punishable by death.
Call it what you may, classify it as bullshit if you want.
If continued I will not last long in this community? hmm.. Okay kick me out if that's what you want it to be :/
I will not say transmuting metals to gold is my opinion, though, as it's been done before in the 1920s and its being done today even in the U.S.
Lastly, you stating that these CERN physicists and Professional Chemists and chemistry professors (all who have PhDs) are lying or being paid to lie is ridiculous. Just because it's a video on YouTube doesn't mean it's bullshit. It's from the history channel yes, but they are interviewing CERN physicists and professional chemists/chemistry professors that are telling you exactly how they transmute Mercury into gold. They literally tell you how they transmute the Mercury into gold by "nuclear transmutation" and show you a video representation before showing the final yield actually being Au Gold from Mercury.
I would understand if somebody called walking on the ground and thus absorbing 'free electrons' (what is referred to as grounding) pseudoscience.
I reread the thread and I am sorry if I was unnecessarily closed minded regarding the mercury gold idea and called it pseudoscience in general. I understand that nuclear fusion exists, I was rather talking about the idea that the egyptians or other cultures mastered this process in the past without the equipment and conditions necessary that we have access to these days, which we have no evidence of (though they were certainly looking for such thing, I wonder to what extent more symbolic than literally)
Any discussion based on sources and repeatable experiments is welcome, and other speculation (such as wether egyptians had mastered this process) can be discussed when disclaimers are made.
Lastly, this all started from discussing the effect of purity of dmt crystals. The claim was that 0.01 difference % (or similar) would affect an experience, using as an analogy the transmutation of metals. But those are two totally different things. With the question regarding whether small amounts affect the experience, a simple double blind study, as linked earlier, would already solve the question, and we wouldn't have to speculate. Are you willing to do it yourself? I would be curious to know the results

, hmmm .. I make a loose bet on 
