RayOfLight said:
Ron paul says he would end all the unjustified and illegal wars perpetrated by the usa and acknowledge the fact that the terrorist threat is actually created by the US meddling in other nations affairs, that right there is reason enough to vote for the guy as far as I'm concerned. There is nothing lofty or undo able about it, PULL TROOPS OUT , SEND THEM HOME . PERIOD. SIMPLE ...I dunno how I can be any more clear than that.
How? This is not solely a presidential power. Most of this decision making rests with congress. Corporate interests assure that we will be staying in Iraq...we just built the largest military base/embassy on foreign soil anywhere in the world in Iraq. Do you really think we're going to abandon that? We have military troops stacked up in the kandahar valley, getting blown to bits every day (moreso than anywhere else at present, iirc) specifically to open up a trade route from afghanistan to pakistan for Haliburton to move supplies. Why would we abandon these two projects, nevermind the hundreds of similar undertakings that are also going on? We have a vested interest in continuing these wars and plundering these resources.
RayOfLight said:
He would also end the drug war witch would save your country god knows how much money in throwing drug users in jail, that right there should be enough reason to vote for him again. For the life of me I just don't understand what it is about that that is so hard to comprehend.
This power does not lie with the president either, but also with congress. Ray, i respect your right to an opinion, but your posts reflect an absolute lack of knowledge of American civics. Many Americans also lack this understanding, so it's not overly surprising that you are unaware of the mechanisms by which change happens in our country, but you need to understand that the things you are saying simply cannot happen as you present them.
Ray, as to your points about healthcare, are you aware that the USA could change the national deficit into a surplus solely by nationalizing healthcare? This is an economic fact and is easily found with a simple google search. The majority of Amnericans supported a public option for healthcare, as evidenced by numerous polls, but because the politicians are owned by corporate and financial interests (of which the insurance agencies make up a huge percentage) they ignored the will of the people to ensure the sanctity of the oligarchs.
Lastly, I have a final question for you. Do you know who pays Ron Paul's campaign bills? Do you know who supports him? You talk about him as though he is not supported by special interest groups, corporate interests or PACs...I would suggest you look into this because, afaik, there is no one currently serving in the American political system on the national level who does not get money from these people. The reason for this is that it is impossible to fund campaigns and win election without the significant contributions such organizations are able to make. So when you present Paul as a man of the people, devoid of special interest influence, I believe you are in error.
Again, I commend Ron Paul for supporting this bill and hope that we can achieve some real change in this arena. I'm going to be calling m,y representative again today to urge her to support this measure.