^..it's the fact that this kind of healing-based work, which is a common designation in pre-european influenced cultures, is becoming very rare that knowledge of it's existence needs to be preserved..
if you've ever been lucky enough to undergo healing from a dedicated individual, then differentiating this approach becomes important..why? i personally wouldn't surrender my health and being in entheogenic session to most people..there are some i trust..the definition of 'true' shaman is to define what i trust..substitute the term 'spirit healer' if shaman is unacceptable..
there are individuals both in South America and Europe/elsewhere who have run very questionable sessions (in terms of safety/supervision) which have lead to trauma and death..a community of any kind needs yard-sticks by which to judge the efficacy or ethics of people giving others mind-altering plants..
..taking medicine on one's own, or with friends is one thing..taking responsibility for a wider range of people (who are not known personally) is another..
BecomeTheOther wrote:
there are healing shamans but there are also bewitching shamans, they are shamans but do not heal, so by definition that is not correct but only a generalization of what a "shaman" is.
..i have to respectfully disagree..these are 'sorcerers', or 'brujos' or just dodgy 'ayahuasqueros'..
not 'curanderos' which at least jamie agreed to use as a term..whether it's africa, or australia, or peru, there's folks trusted to heal (say your wife or children) and those who are known to be able to do magic (sorcery) with or without plants..the almost universally 'indigenous' cross-cultural perspective is that pursuit of personal power and gain is not trustworthy in the wider community..why should i trust someone and their brew..
better to do one's own, sure, if there isn't any kind of trusted and trained person(s) about..
also, the kind of training many of these practitioners do is very demanding..most people would give up..too hard..a lot of discipline..yes, people can do such training on their own, but i know very few people go to the extents these traditional systems do..
i'm not sure which 'argument' you're referring to, but personally i am also talking about community sanctioned traditional healers in many different cultures..not just Sth America..'shaman' is a general term to designate the orientation..it's not even specifically about whether they use entheogens or not..
Also i think it is not anyones place to sound like an expert on peruvian shamanism, unless of course that person has undergone a full apprenticship for themselves and really understands what they are talking aobut.
..a few here have spent quite a bit of time with such people, who tend to instruct automatically..
I think some shamans heal, but also i think some part of being a shaman is "magical voyaging" to the unseen realms
..that, IMO, is for Everyone..we can all magically voyage..no special tricks there..just the plants and spirit..