Good point. There's not much point trying to present rational data to someone who tells you "I don't care about facts, I don't care if something has been well-established since before I was born, this is my BELIEF dangit, and I'm stickin' to it"
i see her post like 30 times everyday and say a whole lot of nothing.
-Irrelevantbacchus said:but isn't this coatl girl like 18 or something?
-Because they can.bacchus said:why are all of you chemists and biologists and legitimate science people engaging her in debate and expecting anything logical or intelligent from her end?
I see ONE post from you doing the same.bacchus said:i see her post like 30 times everyday and say a whole lot of nothing.
We continue arguing simply because dismissing someone's post/opinions on the grounds that it is an "18 year old immature girl" is basically an ad hominem argument, therefore fallacious and invalid.bacchus said:long time lurker, first time poster. don't mean to be rude or anything, but isn't this coatl girl like 18 or something? why are all of you chemists and biologists and legitimate science people engaging her in debate and expecting anything logical or intelligent from her end? just kind of seems like you're encouraging her. i see her post like 30 times everyday and say a whole lot of nothing.
So you do not think that people can be programmed from birth to be men or women either?coatl said:But you cannot deny the fact that someone can be born programmed to be homosexual.
Sure I can. I do NOT think people are "programmed from birth" to be homosexual.
Phlux- said:hrmm maybe we should be discussing spice here - not gayness - honestly, what the hell, how is it any one members business what any other members sexual preference is ? i just simply don't see why it needs to be discussed. It seems conversations on religion, homosexuality, etc always end up in arguments, i avoid those conversations like the plague now.
Evening Glory said:I find it somewhat shocking that you first come with agressive attacks against a person, and then in the next sentence ask people to be nice against eachother. How can you justify that? I can see how you might get offended by what Bacchus wrote, it was indeed not nice, but that does in no way justify what you just wrote. Please 'Coatl, for both your own good and for the good of the lovely people here, think twice before you let your out-of-control ego drop bombs like this.
deedle-doo said:[quote='Coatl]
I still don't believe you are born gay (and I'm sure there are plenty of scientist who would agree with me)
So you do not think that people can be programmed from birth to be men or women either?
Watch out your answer; what can make you a man or a woman is the exact thing that can also make you a homosexual.
The blank slate theory was essentially thrown out 30 years ago.
Some things we are taught. Like, the fear of homosexuals. You may have been taught this. A propensity toward fear and intolerance may have a genetic componenet, idk.
You were mis-spelling it as 'pedo'. You were slandering someone by calling them a paedophile, without evidence.