• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Is our reality a school/prison also after this life?

Migrated topic.
Life isn't always nice. Sometimes it's tough. I don't think that seeking an escape in metaphysical speculations will solve any of that.

Many of us want to be positive. If you visit any bookstore you'l notice that half the shelves are filled with these 'how to be a happy person' books by these doctor wayne dyer's, doctor phill's and whatnot.

People don't seem to get that life may sometimes throw some bad stinking shit at you, but whether you're generally speaking a happy positive person is not determined by how well you manage to avoid this.

People hope that these books will help them get rich, get a lover, get healthy, get everything they want by the 'power pf positive thinking' and all that blah...

Whether you're a happy and positive person depends basically on how well you manage to deal with all the shit in live.

When everything would only be nice and funny all the time, then it wouldn't be so hard for so many people to be happy and positive.

Any rejection of this world you happen to live in, and metaphysical speculations are often in the form of such a rejection (plato, kant, the bible, etc.) is a refusal to deal with life as it is. Therefore paradoxically these metaphysical speculations of wishes to be happy someday in the future are the real chains that imprison many of us.

Life becomes a prison, the moment you want to escape it.
 
I don't recall having speculated about what your personal problems could be.

I was speaking in general. About how many believers in all kind of metaphysical truths show a general disdain for the material world we're living in.

In the western and mediterenean parts of the world, this started with plato and has accumulated to religious extremism of islam, judeism and christianity as well as communism and some radical environmentalism.

Extreme anti-materialism is definately a form of escapism and not less shallow than any other form like alcoholism or gambling.

By rejecting physical sensations, people show psychological weakness. apparently they cannot simply master their own desires, but need to radically escape and hide from them.

But you're right that we definately could be living in a world that is not entirely what it seems. In a sense we're imprisoned then, because our knowledge will never be complete.

Apparently the negative term 'imprisonment' sparks a different type of reaction than when you use other words for the same philosophical dilemma.
 
It's the second ofcourse.

I don't object the idea that reality could be an illusion like in 'the matrix'.

Many great thinkers have speculated on this issue, each with their own philosophical purpose, from descartes to plato, to siddharta gautama to nagarjuna.

I don't see anything objectionable about the argument as such besides the first thing i mentioned earlier, that even then some things would still be certain and second the argument that is known as occam's razor.

All that's needed for consensus reality to be true is consensus reality itself, while in the 'matrix' scenario, more is required for it to be true. We would need the whole of consensus reality (although it being virtual) and another totally new and different reality as well.

So that's an argument on likelyhood.
 
observationtype said:
Thank you for your argument polytrip. :d


Maybe I should reformulate the topic to:


Given that we know that consensus reality is not all there is, is consensus reality a prison even after death?

or

Given that we know that consensus reality is not all there is, is consensus reality and similar physical realities as consensus reality a prison even after death?


I believe that the "Given that we know that consensus reality is not all there is" part is almost deliberately constructed to be impossible to find out. I believe that anyone who studies consensus reality all of his life will never find a prove which clearly shows the external. I bet the probability of this happening is, for example, sth. like 0,000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.001.


I rather rely on "subjective proves".


things are what you make them, a prison is a prison only if you deem it a prison (in the sense discussed in this thread). Maybe your prison is my somewhat limited exploration chamber...

As Rorschach says in Watchmen: "None of you seem to understand. I'm not locked in here with you. You're locked in here with ME!":lol: :lol:

Everything is relative, it's all about perception...

How deep does the rabbit hole go becomes an irrelevant question once you realize that the rabbit-hole is really a tesseract (no different than the shamanistic snake who eats his own tale)...
 
observationtype said:
Your post is a mindfuc# to me (no offence intended).
None taken, I like to get down and dirty with the mind

observationtype said:
So, you say everything is much more limitless if I change my perception?
This is what I experience through the mushroom, ayahuasca, DMT, Mescaline and other ethnobotnaicals and their alkaloids...I assume it's what people attempt to do with LSD and the other synthetics as well...maybe I'm not understanding something...

observationtype said:
If you say "in the sense discussed in this thread" you do understand that I mean being able to ride on dragons, fly to other dimensions, talk with aliens, experience the godsource etc. but still being trapped in a system of a limited set of such experiences? I mean being able to experience these after death, yes but still being stuck in a physical world with less freedom.
Riiiight, except that I don't consider myself trapped...I am but one aspect of creation, of existence, of life...When the illusion dissolves I see that physical worlds are merely one interpretation of the vibration of the energy that flows through all things. I don't see myself as trapped in a limited set of experiences. I have seen that every moment is an eternity, yet somehow my perception at this point (unaltered human consciousness) I am somehow moving through these eternities as though they are finite...Is this making sense? Are you seeing what I'm saying? I don't know how to even define boundaries at the point of death...something along the lines of Association Theory.

observationtype said:
If your limited exploration chamber contains the prison, then can you please access your exploration chamber and beam yourself into my room so that I realize that I limit reality with my perception. I am serious, please do this if you can. I am stuck within my own perception and need help. If you cannot beam yourself into my room, please give me some sign. If you cannot, I guess I have to stick to my limited perception.
Hahahaha, and HERE is where you really misunderstood what I was saying. I don't see this plane as a prison, I was picking at your statement semantically, your prison and my exploration chamber are the same thing, except for the attitude with which we approach them, evidenced by the intrinsic values, connotations, and paradigms inherent in referring to anything as a prison.

observationtype said:
SnozzleBerry said:
"Everything is relative, it's all about perception..."

If this is true, then can you please beam yourself into my room or give me at least some kind of sign. I would really appreciate you doing this. I mean, just change your perception and rearrange everything because it is all relative.
If we were both on ayahuasca, who's to say I couldn't? Is that not one of the purposes of the SHE (Synchronized Hyperspace Event)? You seem to be acting as though entheogens do not shift your perceptions...I find this interesting...please elaborate.

observationtype said:
SnozzleBerry said:
How deep does the rabbit hole go becomes an irrelevant question once you realize that the rabbit-hole is really a tesseract (no different than the shamanistic snake who eats his own tale)...

The snake I encountered so far does not eat anything and does not move even though I changed my perception to some degree.
I don't get what you're saying here, I've encountered the infinite snake, the tesseracting snake, the looped snake, whatever you wanna call it. It's an archetypical shamanistic vision. Ultimately what I was saying is that your perception of existence caused you to label it a prison, but this a fallacy due to an incomplete picture, much as the only person who asks how deep the rabbit hole goes is the one who does not realize it's not a "straight hole" but a "looped hole" (tesseract) and the asking of the question highlights the fact that the understanding is incomplete.

*DISCLAIMER*
I am in no way claiming to have a whole, complete, or otherwise specially synthesized view of reality. Read my signature for my opinion on my views...
 
Seriously folks, I'm all for people being allowed to voice their opinions and discuss such interesting philosophical topics but why is this guy being allowed to railroad every subject back to his wacky conspiracy theories? He's clearly not interested in entheogens and has no desire to participate in discussion outside of his own tunnel reality, and now he's claiming that we're all being deceived by a substance which is available in nature.

I hate to say it and I'll take the inevitable criticism for this but I suggest his membership is terminated and this discussion ceased or else you'll be arguing this matter for the foreseeable future.

This guy should go to somewhere like abovetopsecret or one of the other wackadoodle conspiracy sites as he's not doing anything to further the main subject of this website. He doesn't accept anyone else's point of view and I've already decided to cease participation on this forum due to his suggestions that I may be in some way 'involved' in his preposterous conspiracy and causing my professional credentials to be called into question.

Just to make a quick point before the OP decides that my name is some clue to my participation in his imaginary plan. My name "Ordo Ab Chao" rougly means "Order out of chaos" and is the motto of the 33rd degree of Scottish Rite Freemasonry. Just in case he decides to bring that up at any point.....:lol: :evil: :d
 
I don't find your words offensive, but I do bristle slightly at your tone. You write as a gatekeeper, as though you have seen and thought of all the possibilities and THIS MUST BE IT. I do not believe you are trying to impose your values or beliefs on me, I merely wish to precede my reply with this so that you can think about it as you respond. Your post begins by saying I have failed to take in account 4 things. First I would point out that with a discussion on reality being a prison after death, you must be willing to expand your mind. First, all of your discussions present an anthropocentric view of everything. I feel fairly safe to say that when discussing reality, post death, anthropo-anything must be thrown out the window as we are no longer human, whatever we may be, energy, soul, creation, allness, or the bleak alternative, nothing, we have lost our human characteristics. I will now go through your very authoritatively worded reply and respond. If I am at all harsh in my replies, please don't take it personally, I'm just bucking against the limitations you seem so intent to place on me.

Also, while I did take the time to respond to these four, "well what ifs", I would like to say that I feel these are no different than the speculations on the implications of DMT which can be found through the homepage portal and feel that once again you are doing exactly what you are railing against and are ultimately limiting your understanding to your experiences (which is what we all do but no one has experienced even a fraction of a percent of everything)...Ok, sorry for that last ramble, couldnt really get the thoughts together, it's been a long day at work...now to address your post:

observationtype said:
(1) All of these experiences may show you deliberately false "wonderlands" for real, because the drug is deliberately designed that way.
No...just no...nothing you have said here can actually be applied or examined. who are you to describe what I have seen as deliberately false. Especially given the psilocybin done in the '50s where it was shown that psilocybin increases visual acuity. There is a very strong probability that these are NOT false in any sense of the word in either the essence of the drug or the experience/reality presented.

observationtype said:
(2) All of these experiences may show you alternate universes for real which are all part of a subordinate system but this subordinate system is only part of a larger system. The subordinate system is the prison and not the totality of existence. The totality of existence would be the system, not the subordinate system. Your exploration chamber and the prison are not the same thing - I do not believe that I misunderstood you.

But you DID misunderstand me, and as in your earlier post, your misunderstanding is evidenced in your presentation of "the fact". It's only a prison when you decide it's a prison and you completely missed all of that. That was the point, remember how I talked about semantics? Yea, that's what I was referring to. If you were sent to real prison, yet were enlightened enough to project your consciousness/essence out of that prison the prison would ultimately be irrelevant.

Alternatively, if you were sent to prison for five years and chose yo spend the whole time in your cell or on work detail or in the showers with bubba, or scared for your life or whatever, then yea, it truly was prison. If however you take those five years and get yourself several degrees, create art, and live through existence, I would hesitate to call this prison. I'm not debating where you physically are (and yes, before you rebut, thanks to an illegal search of my car several years ago I spent some time in Jail down in South Carolina, prior to getting shit sorted out and getting off) but your attitude defines where you (in that expansive non-materialistic state) are. Emotional states are all self-created and self-sustained...attitude is more than you recognize it to be.

Systems exist, yes. Subordinate systems can exist within those systems as well, but no system is a prison until you and i and everyone else collectively agree that it is (Man, it's a shame that Burnt's not here to chomp my ass for that line 😉 )



observationtype said:
(3) By ingesting drugs, you are able to leave the subordinate system and enter the system which supercedes it only temporarily. After you consume drugs, you always come back to the same reality. The drugs show you "more" but this "more" might not be what you are able to choose from after death.
ok, so what? So, let's say that that more is not a viable option, what about the infinite other mores that exist from other perspectives. What are the "mores" available to gamma rays? You can't answer because you don't know, and this is my point. This is how your authoritative authorship attempts to abstain from addressing alternative, yet no less real, points of view. What about the mores for the vibrational energy coming from the rings of saturn, what possibilities are open to them? The fact that drugs show that there are other possibilities is enough, or should be, because once you see the extent of different possibilities it becomes evident that the human experience is an infinitesimal sliver of the possibilities...the possibilities are endless.



observationtype said:
(4) The drug-induced experiences let you experience what you CAN BE but not what you ARE in the physical reality. Your first post sounded as if you have godpowers on earth and can manipulate reality just as you want to. Yet, you did not beam yourself into my room and I did not see any sign.
I understand what you are saying, but for the moment where I am what I CAN BE, that's what I am. I am really not I. I use I to refer to myself as the 12 year old who was staunchly anti-drug, but that is not who I AM. I creates a false sense of continuity. I creates an illusion of stasis when the reality is change. I have experienced long term changes as a result of my entheogenic experiences. After my first 1/8 of mushrooms I knew that my gf was cheating on me, I knew what she was lying about, I knew details she hadn't told anyone...I have experienced boundary dissolution and interpsychic phenomena while not on drugs. There are mystics, yogis and the like throughout the world who do the same thing. Have you seen the meditation aids used by the Ancient Indians? The Geometry is straight DMT fractals and the like. I AM everything I have ever been. I AM everything I will ever be.

It's all here, just like the thousands of botanical species in your front yard you will never see because their seeds (which are unquestionalby there) will never receive the exact combination of everything they need to sprout, watch, this allegory will be observable as climate change increases rain patterns and god knows what starts popping up. I will reiterate, the possibilities are endless, each moment is an eternity, just because you can't access or see this all the time does not make it false any more than my saying it makes it true...


observationtype said:
I believe that entheogens change perceptions. However, I posted this before and these words are not from me. This excerpt is from a thread on abovetopsecret.com. I provided the link at the beginning of this thread.



2. Terence McKenna is a great man, wise, and have had many insights and I have high respect for him and his work.

However, you are assuming that consuming psychedelic substances for some reason will reveal "the Whole Truth" to you. That is a rather broad assumption to take. These substances can certainly give many insights, and open new perspectives of reality, and perhaps in some cases go very deep and beyond what people such as Terence McKenna ever got to experience before his unfortunately early death.

But, you also have to consider that the psychedelic substances themselves may perhaps be part of a different reality all together, one which may create certain amounts of experiences, thus making a person believing he "got it" and the "answer to everything". Perhaps by design - by whomever created these substances as a part of Earths biological system in the first place.

Nevertheless, I agree these substances gan give an insight into other realms and ones own personal being - but only to some degree. In the end, ultimately, everything is up to you yourself and not any outside external influence.

Right, so if everything is up to yourself, we are in agreement. This reality is not a prison, you have merely deemed it a prison and are acting as such. Perceived power creates real power, I think that's probably one of the main themes you're glossing over in this thread. Yea, T Mac was the shit and he himself said you should take everything he said with a grain of salt (or mebbe 5 dried grams of stropharia cubensis). I dunno I feel like I had other things to say, I', sure your response will spark them.


observationtype said:
Even if meeting on ayahuasca in a synchronized hyperspace event for real is possible it could be an illusion just as consensus reality. You seem so fascinated about entheogens and seem to belief that everything is limitless, that all options are available to you and that you are totally free. I believe this to be a fallacy. Such beliefs through entheogens are another indication to me, that there could be more truth to this prison theory. Entheogens seem to fuel the ego, to corrupt the ego with "everything-is-possible-and-I-am-limitless" beliefs and make you blind of another perspective. This last sentence sounds like an offence - I understand - but please do not see it as one because I just wanted to make my point of view clearer. Your post was interesting and contributed to this thread. I thank you for that!

haha, no. That's really all i have to say to this, but knowing that that will not be seen as acceptable here's why...At the point where the ego is long gone and my essence is still intact your whole claim falls apart. I am no more blind than you are. I accept that your own life experiences and whatnot gave you the perspective you have. It is not about being limitless, it is about being semi-permeably bounded, it's about the malleability of the definitions of life and death. It's about the fact that these terms dont mean anything, don't believe me? Look up life and death in the dictionary. We don't know what it means to be dead, we really don't know what it means to be alive other than our experiences either. Hell, just the fact that we call it living and not dying is evidence to how much all of this "reality" that you consider a prison is subject to our own perceptions. We are not bounded from existence, we interact with it, we shape it.

energy is not created, nor is it destroyed, nor is it permanently incarcerated...it just is...I guess we'll just have to wait and see what lies beyond.
 
Our reality is a prison. We are being created by God in the 3rd dimension, but heading in to the 4th one. Three dimensional reality sucks.
 
Interesting that you have no time to carry on legitimate debate, yet you engage kartikay and Ordo ab Chao in a seemingly frivolous manner...

So here, that way may resume some semblance of real debate, allow me to help with your Ordo ab Chao discussion ORDO, PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I GET ANY OF THIS WRONG

observationtype said:
Ordo ab Chao said:
Just to make a quick point before the OP decides that my name is some clue to my participation in his imaginary plan. My name "Ordo Ab Chao" rougly means "Order out of chaos" and is the motto of the 33rd degree of Scottish Rite Freemasonry. Just in case he decides to bring that up at any point....



I do not know how to understand this paragraph - you speak in riddles. Without interpreting what you really mean and accidentally accuse you of something you are not, I list all possibilities I can think of right now. I likely forgot something. Can you please elaborate further? Please be serious, because what you say sounds peculiar.


Is it untruth and funny?
Is it truth and funny?
Is it truth disguised as ridiculousness to make the whole idea deliberately seem ridiculous?
Is it untruth?
Is it truth?
Is it some other truth disguised as ridiculousness to make the whole idea deliberately seem ridiculous?
Is it just crazy?
Is it funny?

He's saying you're a conspiracy theory spouting zealot and following this, wanted to give a disclaimer in advance of you potentially calling out his username as indicative of him being involved in conspiratorial groups. I really can't comprehend how you couldn't unpack the meaning from this. This post combined with some of the obvious whiffs in our debate it makes me seriously question the legitimacy of this discussion. I'm gonna hang around in the event you do wish to discuss things legitimately, we'll see...
 
observationtype said:
I unpacked the meaning you mentioned from Ordo Ab Chao's paragraph as one possibility but why are you so sure that "THIS MUST BE IT"? If I read the paragraph, I only see "information". Basically, everything is "information". Why do you interpret it the way you do while the interpretations I propose have the same legitimacy? Why do you believe that your meaning is more probable?
Because that was clearly the intent...that's why. This kind of ridiculous psychobabble is what wrecks discussions like this, allow me to explain:

If a man is in the distance jumping up and down, waving frantically at you and running towards you, you don't know if he's trying to kill you, prevent something horrible from happening to you or what the hell is going on. That is random information open to interpretation.

If on the other hand a man runs up to you, yells something you don't understand at you, and then points a gun at your face, regardless of the specifics you can be pretty damn sure he's threatening your life...the other information essentially becomes irrelevant as the essence of what is relevant to you is revealed through his body language.

Given Ordo's tone, language, and overall demeanor, he is clearly, imo, saying what I have stated as his meaning (he hasn't contradicted me yet) and what you realized (at least on some level) was his meaning (you yourself stated it as a "possibility" ).

You've essentially decided to ignore the fact that he's pointing a gun at your head and you, instead of trying to fight or take flight, are standing there going, "I can't understand you! What are you saying? EEEENGLISH! DO YOU SPEAK IT? WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM ME?!?!". Does that make sense? This is why I have my doubts as to having a real converstaion here, you're all caught up in frivolities and distractions that have nothing to do with real points or thoughts. Everything is relative, if you can't use context, your screwed, imo.

I'll be here, ready to engage in discussion whenever you respond to our previous remarks, I just had to voice some doubt as to the potential for growth through such discussion...

peace

P.S.
1664 said:
is this thread still going?????
That would be a yes
 
Jorkest said:
i have seen the prison as well...at first i was pissed..but then..i realized that because there IS an OUT there..that means we werent always IN here..which means we can get out...when i first saw the prison...it is obviously way too advanced of a system to escape from...but i feel like there MUST be some way...almost like a puzzle or riddle...quote]

Indeed, Jorkest...

Let's say that these ideas are valid and can be proven. A rational mind must accept them as their nature commands. Which is why I'm having trouble with obervationtype's division in concept between a spiritual prison and school when speaking about human living experience.

Prisons serve a very specific function (or so I have been taught). To seperate a person or a group of people until he/she/they meet the set requirements for returning to the outside world. This is acheived through punishment, education, and self-reflection.

Schools serve a very specific function (or so I have been taught). To seperate a person or a group of people so that he/she/they have the oppurtunity to learn the set requirements for getting-by in the outside world. This is acheived through punishment, education, and self-reflection.

To my eyes it seems that the only difference between the two terms, used in contension, is how we decide to think about them.

If one thinks about life as a school, then study, learn and enjoy everything it has to offer...and don't get too wrapped up in fairy stories that only serve to upset you.

But if one thinks about life as a prison...what options does that leave you with? Not very nice ones in my opinion. At the very least you deprive yourself of a learning experience.

Enjoy yourself...this may be the only chance you get.
 
Well thanks for clearing that up...but I can't help feeling that you're missing on a massive piece of positivity.

And here it is...

If entheogens and oneirogens etc. open us up to our higher selves and help us attain Moksha...isn't it a good thing that these plants still exist? That no matter what they do the Earth still provides them for us (with the aid of those beautiful botanist types ;) ).

Like Bill Hicks said..."George Bush said,'"we are losing the war on drugs"', well that implies that there's a war being fought and people on drugs are winning it" ^^

If there truly is a system of beings or entities or whatever restricting our progress...maybe it's there for a reason? Maybe the whole point is to challenge man to grow beyond these limitations?

Personally...I don't care...life is beautiful inside and outside, I am one with something (what that something is is up for interpretation and debate), and there is no need to fear or feel alone...ever! Ain't that a better message than, "watch out man there's a whole bunch of rich men who rule the world and don't want you to know how beautiful you really are"?

If they exist...then bollocks to them...if they don't then WAHEY!!! Lets go fly a kite ^^
 
sunshineandsmiles said:
Like Bill Hicks said..."George Bush said,'"we are losing the war on drugs"', well that implies that there's a war being fought and people on drugs are winning it" ^^

Ain't that a BITCH?
 
This entire thread is built on the premise that the human perception provides us with an accurate and absolute mapping (or at the very least, a synthesized and applicable view) of the whole of reality. Because none of us has any ability to comment on reality from the point of view from anything but a human, I must posit that this entire thread is built on incomplete knowledge (as is everything, but in this case we are attempting to discern if reality is a prison, even after death, not whether or not it is possible to put a man on the moon and thus this incompleteness becomes that much more salient). Because no one knows what reality appears as from a non-human viewpoint, it would be naive and foolish to assume that this current perspective provides any true or absolute knowledge vis a vis "objective" reality.

There was never a good answer provided to the question of "is this reality a prison to a gamma ray?" and there can't be, we're not gamma rays and have no clue what possibilities exist from that perspective. Moreso, not only is this knowledge incomplete, but anything beyond anthropic viewpoints is purely of a speculative nature and does not actually allow for greater depth of understanding or debate, merely turns the debate into an argument mired in speculation. It is for these reasons that I find this thread rife with fallacy and will be withdrawing from it, you guys have fun.

peace

SB
 
SnozzleBerry said:
This entire thread is built on the premise that the human perception provides us with an accurate and absolute mapping (or at the very least, a synthesized and applicable view) of the whole of reality. Because none of us has any ability to comment on reality from the point of view from anything but a human, I must posit that this entire thread is built on incomplete knowledge (as is everything, but in this case we are attempting to discern if reality is a prison, even after death, not whether or not it is possible to put a man on the moon and thus this incompleteness becomes that much more salient). Because no one knows what reality appears as from a non-human viewpoint, it would be naive and foolish to assume that this current perspective provides any true or absolute knowledge vis a vis "objective" reality.

There was never a good answer provided to the question of "is this reality a prison to a gamma ray?" and there can't be, we're not gamma rays and have no clue what possibilities exist from that perspective. Moreso, not only is this knowledge incomplete, but anything beyond anthropic viewpoints is purely of a speculative nature and does not actually allow for greater depth of understanding or debate, merely turns the debate into an argument mired in speculation. It is for these reasons that I find this thread rife with fallacy and will be withdrawing from it, you guys have fun.

peace

SB

Nice 😉
 
Is our reality a prison even after death? Maybe not. you see the human race was built for a purpose. there is a reason we are here. that is to serve. who when or how, i dont know
inflate the numbers by intelligent and rational growth and planning, then extrapolate, dumb down through culture and authority. Then collect
 
I've been following this thread off and on for a while, observationtype, and I can very much appreciate the concern you feel regarding the possibility that feelings of limitation and imprisonment might continue after death. For myself, I have concluded that the very fact that we are FEELING imprisoned automatically gives rise to the necessity of a complementary and opposite feeling...the other side of this coin is release/liberation, and this is why there is nothing to worry about.
 
Back
Top Bottom